hiring, promotion, and buying decisions, so they are vital to professional success.
However, women and minorities tend to be less involved in informal networks since they
feel different or outnumbered.
Mentoring relationships—occur when a senior colleague helps a junior employee build a
career. Minorities and women have a harder time finding other minorities and women to
mentor them, since fewer occupy senior positions. Men may also feel uncomfortable
mentoring younger women for fear of gossip or sexual tension. These elements perpetuate
patterns where white men receive more help in career advancement.
Glass ceilings and walls—Glass ceilings consist of subtle discrimination that acts as
barriers to limit career advancement of women and minorities. The subtle discrimination
may take form of the gendered stereotypes (see answer to question 1). The term “glass
walls” is a metaphor referencing sex segregation in the workplace. Women tend to be
placed in positions that require traditional feminine skills, which often do not include
career advancement.
Students should provide an explanation of why they feel the two informal practices they
have selected are the most damaging and then pick one of the following means to redressed
gendered inequity and address a strength and weakness of this method. The answer should
clearly indicate how this method will address the informal practices they have addressed in
their response; this element of the answer may vary.
Equal Opportunity Laws—These are laws that prohibit discrimination against individuals
who are members of groups who have historically faced discrimination. The focus is to
extend equal opportunity to all within an organization. These laws would be unlikely to
address the subtle, informal discriminatory practices addressed in this question.
Affirmative action—These policies aim to increase the representation of women and
minorities in education and the workplace with qualified, although not necessarily the best
qualified, candidates. These policies are based upon the ideas that in order to redress
historical discrimination to groups of people, there should be preferential treatment for
qualified members of these groups. The effectiveness of these policies is judged by results,
not intent. Benefits of this method include addressing a legacy of bias against certain
groups, while still maintaining qualification standards and gaining the benefits of diverse
organizational membership at all levels of the organization. Disadvantages may include
difficult implementation due to a limited availability of qualified people from historically
underrepresented groups.
Quotas—Using a results-oriented focus like affirmative action, quotas aim to require a
certain number or percentage of minorities and women to be admitted, hired, or promoted
within an organization. A benefit of this method is women and/or minorities would be
guaranteed to comprise a certain percentage of the organization. A disadvantage is that
they may not be qualified and minority or female organizational members overall may be
stigmatized as having only received a position because of belonging to a disadvantaged
group.
Goals—Similar to quotas, but represents only an organization’s stated intention of
achieving a certain percentage of women and/or minorities. Goals have the same