In section 7.5, the pros and cons of rural-urban migration are reviewed. Migration is viewed as both a symptom
and contributor to underdevelopment, much as population growth is. The Todaro migration model helps
explain why it is rational for people to continue to move to crowded cities where unemployment is high and
rising in section 7.6. The model is based on differences in expected income between the urban and rural
sector. High urban unemployment is inevitable given the large expected income differentials between the
rural and urban sectors that exist in many developing countries. Both a verbal and a diagrammatic presentation
of the model are included.
Important conclusions from the Todaro model include:
The need to reduce the urban bias of development strategies and encourage integrated rural
development. This will reduce the wage differential between the urban and rural area.
Creating urban jobs is an insufficient solution to the urban unemployment problem because more
migration is induced.
Expanding education opportunities often results in more migration.
Urban wage subsidies are counterproductive as they encourage more migration by increasing the
probability of finding a job.
Section 7.7 describes policy options for reducing migration and increasing employment that follow from
the Todaro model and include creating an appropriate rural-urban economic balance, expanding small
scale labor intensive industries, eliminating factor price distortions, choosing appropriate labor-intensive
technologies, modifying the link between education and employment, reducing population growth, and
decentralizing authority.
A mathematical formulation of the Todaro migration model is included in an appendix to the chapter.
The chapter ends with a description of migration and urbanization in India and Botswana, with most
emphasis placed on the former.
Lecture Suggestions
Students find the statistics on urbanization and the growth of the informal sector interesting. A debate on
the pros and cons of promoting the informal sector is more interesting if it comes after the discussion of
the price incentive model in Appendix 5.1 and the Todaro migration model. Some students think of urban
areas in New York or other fast-world cities (rather than a makeshift shantytown) when the term “slum” is
used. A vivid description of a shantytown will maintain student interest and make sure they understand the
very different condition of living in one of the urban areas in, say, Latin America (Rio or Sao Paulo) and
North America (New York or Washington DC). Here especially your personal experiences (along with
perhaps a PowerPoint of pictures you have taken) as well as videos of roadside stalls and other examples
of informal sector activities can make the idea of the informal sector that much more easily understood.
It would be a very good idea to begin the discussion of the Todaro Model by reviewing the Lewis model
(as is done in the text) to make clear that the assumption that all labor that transfers from agriculture is
absorbed into the formal sector is far from the case in developing countries. Simple numerical examples
can help illustrate why it is rational to migrate given high rates of urban unemployment. The Todaro model
looks at the difference between the expected urban wage, (the urban wage times the probability of finding
a job) and the rural wage. Suppose the rural wage is 30 and the urban wage is 70. If unemployment is 50%
then it is still rational for some people to migrate, depending on their level of risk aversion and other
opportunities. A main point to stress is that migration will be influenced by any policy that directly or
indirectly affects rural and/or urban absolute incomes. This is important because migration, in turn, will
affect every aspect of development. It is worth stressing that migration may reinforce urban bias.