Arguments why population growth is a problem include reduced family savings rates, difficulties in
providing basic services to a growing population, and the need for more rapid growth in GDP to keep
up with rising demands for jobs and living standards. Population growth as a cause and consequence
of underdevelopment is discussed. Empirical evidence suggests seven negative consequences of
population growth. When discussing reduced family savings rates it is important to keep in mind the
discussion on pages 303-305 of the text where the authors clearly point to the vicious circle of poverty,
limited savings and the need for children as a form of old-age support.
The possibility of consensus is discussed in insofar as population growth is not the primary cause
of low levels of living, rapid population growth makes development more difficult to achieve and
sustain, and many problems can be attributed to population density.
Section 6.6 describes the policy approaches that include eliminating absolute poverty, reducing income
inequality, expanding education opportunities for women, providing more job opportunities, and improving
access to health care and clean water. Family planning programs in some developing countries are presented
The chapter ends with a case study on China’s one child law.
Lecture Suggestions
The analysis of population and development is of great interest to students. A first lecture should introduce
students to the history of population growth, the geographic dispersion of population, the hidden momentum
of population growth, and the demographic transition. The demographic transition is particularly useful in
stressing the following:
In the developed countries there was a strong link between prosperity and population growth, in that
population growth remained fairly stable until incomes started to increase. Arguably slower population
growth coupled with more favorable geographic conditions (see chapter 2) on the one hand and more
time to reap the benefits of a greater division of labor on the other meant that economic development
was far more like (see E.A. Wrigley’s Continuity, Chance, and Change, Cambridge University Press,
1998.
In the developing countries there is a strong link between access to modern technology and population
growth. This has enabled death rates to decline dramatically without a corresponding increase in
income and move towards modern economic growth.
Other interesting points are related to the natural rate of increase in different regions. In Europe for
example the natural rate of increase rarely exceeded 1%, whereas it is 2–2.5% for many LDCs. Some
countries are actively fighting low fertility including Italy, France, Sweden, S. Korea, Malaysia, and
Singapore. More and more developed countries (with the exception of the US) are experiencing fertility
rates below replacement level which has implications for their role as producers and consumers of
developing country goods.
The Malthusian model can be related to a time period before the era of modern economic growth when
labor was the only factor and technological progress was virtually nonexistent. It would well worth
exploring Ester Boserup’s Population and Technological Change, University of Chicago Press, 1981 as
well as Boserup’s The Conditions of Agricultural Growth, George Allen and Unwin Ltd for a critical view
of the Malthusian model.
A fairly detailed discussion of the new home economics theory of fertility is a good lecture topic. The goal
is to explain:
Why birthrates fall in stage III of the demographic transition.
Why women in developing countries have more children than women in developed countries when
they can least afford them.