Foreign aid is defined as a flow of official capital to developing countries that has a noncommercial,
nonmilitary purpose (from the point of view of the donor) and features favorable interest rates and/or
repayment periods. Some measurement issues are mentioned and data are presented on the volume and
source of foreign aid. It is noted that there is a fine line between commercial and noncommercial objectives,
and tied aid is stressed. The chapter discusses donor country motives and cites political as well as economic
objectives. The two-gap model is introduced to describe the role of aid in relieving the foreign exchange
gap. Developing countries tend to accept aid to supplement scarce domestic resources and to help speed
up the development process. The growing role of non-governmental organizations is mentioned as a source
of aid.
Section 14.5 focuses on conflict and development. The scope of conflict is discussed, as well as the
consequences for armed conflict, including destruction of wealth, worsening poverty, loss of education and
changes in social fabric. Figure 14.5 explains global trends in armed conflict from 1946 to 2008. Next, the
section explains what the risk factors for armed conflict include, finishing with how such conflicts can best
be prevented.
The case study on Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Honduras demonstrates the relevance of many of topics
covered in chapter 14 (such as the ole of aid and remittances) as well we demonstrating the relevance of
many of the other topics developed in the first thirteen chapters
Lecture Suggestions
It is important to take some time developing the arguments for and against MNC investment. Students
often have formed opinions about this topic that may or may not be based on sound economic analysis.
Go through hypothetical examples to identify the goals of the MNC and the developing country as well
as the likely impact on various aspects of the economy. Box 14.1 is a useful summary of the arguments. IT
is important to stress the potential benefits of direct foreign investment in light of chapter 13’s focus on
debt and financial crises (vis-à-vis controlling capital outflows during periods of crisis). Other comments
may include how developing countries have altered their views of MNC investment. This is a topic that is
highly politically charged and, though politics and economics are closely connected, instructors should try
to distinguish the two.
American students may have an exaggerated view of the share of the U.S. federal budget devoted to foreign
aid. In fact, the U.S. contributes just 0.1 percent of GNP to aid, placing it last in percentage terms among
major industrialized countries. A handout ranking countries based on recent information (the World
Development Report contains such information) can be an eye-opener for some students; especially when
the U.S. is contrasted with the relative generosity of the Scandinavians. (Maybe a note that the U.S. is the
most charitable country when private giving is factored in)
Numerical examples can be used to show how MNC investment may not necessarily increase domestic
employment (and may decrease it), assuming a substantially higher capital labor ratio and significant
MNC local borrowing that causes some crowding out of local entrepreneurs.
The political motives behind foreign aid are controversial. It may be pointed out that advancement of U.S.
interests is an explicit objective of the U.S. State Department’s Agency for International Development, and
U.S. AID spokespersons readily volunteer that this has a major influence on aid decisions. The strong
support that the U.S. provided the East Asian tigers arguably had much to do with the strategic importance
of these economies.
Having groups of students scan news articles from the last decade on armed conflict and its impediment
to development in Somalia, Sudan and other nations and present them to their peers is an excellent way
to introduce students to this topic. The discussion of conflict and its role as a barrier to development also
presents you with an example of the truly interdisciplinary nature of development in that many of the
leading researchers in this area are political scientists.