Unethical Behavior Can Be Very Costly
Unethical behavior does not always damage a business, but it can potentially harm the bad actors and
even entire industries and countries. So why take the risk? What is the cost of a lost reputation?
Unethical behavior can also cause other, subtler damage. One survey showed that unethical behavior in
their workplace has reduced productivity, job stability, and profits. Unethical behavior in an organization
also creates a cynical, resentful, and unproductive workforce.
Although there is no guarantee that ethical behavior pays in the short or long run, there is evidence that
the ethical company is more likely to win financially. Ethical companies tend to have a better reputation,
more creative employees and higher returns than those that engage in wrong-doing.3
But if we decide that we want to behave ethically, how do we know what ethical behavior is?
Theories of Ethics
When making ethical decisions, people sometimes focus on the reason for the decision—they want to do
what is right. If they think it is wrong to lie, then they will tell the truth. Other times, people think about
the outcome of their actions. They will do whatever it takes to achieve the right result. This choice—
between doing right and getting the right result—has been the subject of much philosophical debate.
Utilitarian Ethics
Under utilitarian ethics, a correct decision is one that tended to maximize overall happiness and minimize
overall pain. Risk management and cost-benefit analyses are examples of utilitarian business practices.
The critics of utilitarian thought argue that it is difficult to “measure” utility accurately. It is also
difficult to predict benefit and harm accurately.
Deontological Ethics
Proponents of deontological ethics believe that utilitarians have it all wrong, and that the results are not as
important as the reason for which the decision is made. To a deontological thinker, the ends do not justify
the means.
The best-known proponent of the deontological model was an eighteenth-century German philosopher
Immanuel Kant. He believed in the categorical imperative. He also thought that human beings possess a
unique dignity, and that no decision that treats people as commodities could be considered just. The
problem with this belief if that the ends do matter.
Rawlsian Justice
The circumstances people are born in to dramatically affect their outcomes. American philosopher John
Rawls referred to these circumstances as life prospects. In his view, luck matters as much as hard work.
Moral Universalism and Relativism
Some people believe that particular acts are always right or always wrong, regardless of what others may
think. This approach is called moral universalism. Alternatively, others believe that it is right to be
tolerant of different viewpoints and customs. And, indeed, a decision may be acceptable even if it is not
in keeping with one’s own ethical standards. This approach is referred to as moral relativism.
Ethics Traps
33 For sources, see “Ethics: A Basic Framework,” Harvard Business School case 9-307-0509.