978-1285770178 Solution Manual BL ComLaw 1e SM-Ch24

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 15
subject Words 4146
subject Authors Roger LeRoy Miller

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
in whole or in part.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
AT THE ENDS OF THE CASES
CASE 24.1QUESTION (PAGE 470)
THE SOCIAL DIMENSION
subscription) to get the promised item, then the header will be considered deceptive. Similarly,
an e-mail header that says “lose twenty pounds in one week” might be deceptivebut it might
not be if it included a qualifying statement, such as “results not typical.” In this particular case,
an ad placed by ValueClick through its affiliates contained a subject line that said “Get a $300
Gift Card FREE,” when in fact the consumer had to pay a fee or participate in more promotions
THE ETHICAL DIMENSION
Suppose that the defendant automaker had opposed this action solely to avoid paying
for a car that had proved to be a “lemon.” Would this have been unethical? Explain.
Arguably, a judgment against the defendant in this case could have applied to a large number of
vehicles—and potentially to other vehicle makers’ productsand this might have led to a
page-pf2
page-pf3
in whole or in part.
argument that a decision holding debt collectors and their attorneys liable for mistaken
made a mistaken legal interpretation of the act, this would give a competitive advantage to debt
collectors who press the boundaries of lawful conduct. In other words, attorneys would easily
be able to violate the act by making impermissible statements and then later avoid liability by
claiming that the statement represented a mistaken interpretation of the requirements of the act.
The Court agreed with this argument. The Court found it difficult to square such a result with
writing. Would the result have been different? Explain. No. It is not likely that the result in
the Jerman case would have been different if, instead of serving notice on Karen Jerman in
writing, Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich had simply told her about their assumption of
her debt unless she disputed it in writing. The collection agency’s violation of the Federal Debt
Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) was not the form of their notice to Jerman, but requiring her to
4A. How might the ruling in this case affect other collection agencies? When initiating
contact with a debtor to collect a debt, a collection agency must give the debtor a validation
notice that states he or she has thirty days to dispute the debt and request written verification of
it. The ruling in the Jerman case clarifies the terms of the validation notice that collection
careful with the wording of their collection notices.
page-pf4
4 UNIT SIX: GOVERNMENT REGULATION
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website,
in whole or in part.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS IN THE REVIEWING FEATURE
AT THE END OF THE CHAPTER
1A. Deceptive advertising
The advertising would mislead a reasonable consumer who would show up at the store
expecting the advertised item to be available. This is a classic example of bait and switch
advertisingluring a customer in with a low priced item (the MetroRider EZ, the bait), then
switching his or her interest to a more expensive item (the MetroRider FX).
3A. Credit discrimination
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits the denial of credit solely on the basis of race,
religion, national origin, color, gender, marital status, or age. If the clerk required a cosigner on
Sage’s loan because of her race or gender, a court would likely find that the dealer violated this
ANSWER TO DEBATE THIS QUESTION IN THE REVIEWING FEATURE
AT THE END OF THE CHAPTER
Laws against bait-and-switch advertising should be abolished because no
advertise items, so once in the stores, these consumers may end up paying for higher-priced
versions of the same products. Retailers must be prevented from using such unethical tactics.
page-pf5
CHAPTER 24: CONSUMER LAW 5
in whole or in part.
ANSWERS TO ISSUE SPOTTERS IN THE EXAMPREP FEATURE
1A. United Pharmaceuticals, Inc., believes that it has developed a new drug that will be
effective in the treatment of patients with AIDS. The drug has had only limited testing, but
United wants to make the drug widely available as soon as possible. To market the drug,
what must United show the Food and Drug Administration? Under an extensive set of
2A. Gert buys a notebook computer from EZ Electronics. She pays for it with her credit
card. When the computer proves defective, she asks EZ to re pair or replace it, but EZ
refuses. What can Gert do? Under the Truth-in-Lending Act, a buyer who wishes to withhold
payment for a faulty product purchased with a credit card must follow specific procedures to
settle the dispute. The credit card issuer then must intervene and attempt to settle the dispute.
Andrew will not be required to pay for the cookbook because of federal consumer protection
law. The federal Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 allows Andrew to retain or discard the
cookbook without incurring any obligation, because it was unsolicited merchandise. The mailing
of this unordered cookbook could also be considered an unfair trade practice. (As a California
resident, Andrew is also protected by the California Civil Code, which permits consumers to
the liability of the cardholder to $50 for unauthorized charges made prior to the time the creditor
is notified. There is no liability for any unauthorized charges made after the date of notice. In
the case of the Midtown Department Store credit card stolen on May 31, the $500 charge made
on June 1, which is prior to Ochoa’s notice, causes Ochoa to be liable for the $50 limit. For the
June 3 charge of $200 made after the notification, Ochoa has no liability. TILA also deals with
page-pf6
in whole or in part.
page-pf7
CHAPTER 24: CONSUMER LAW 7
in whole or in part.
judgment in the defendants’ favor, and on the reasoning stated above, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.
246A. Deceptive advertising
(Chapter 24Page 467)
247A . BUSINESS CASE PROBLEM WITH SAMPLE ANSWERFair debt collection practices
Engler may recover under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Atlantic is subject to
the FDCPA because it is a debt-collection agency and it was attempting to collect a debt on
behalf of Bank of America. Atlantic also used offensive tactics to collect from Engler. After all,
(a) Check Investors argued that the payors were criminals or tortfeasors because they
had written “bad” checks, and that the amounts of the checks were not “debts” because they
arose from criminal or tortious conduct. For the same reasons, asserted Check Investors, the
payors were not “consumers” entitled to protection under the FDCPA. Check Investors also
argued that the FDCPA did not apply because the firm was collecting NSF checks that it had
court echoed the finding that Check Investors had failed to prove the intent required to establish
a crime or tort and added that, even if intent had been shown, the FDCPA had no “fraud”
exception. The court held that even if accepted the contention that the payors were criminals or
tortfeasors, they would still qualify as consumers under the FDCPA.
page-pf8
8 UNIT SIX: GOVERNMENT REGULATION
in whole or in part.
To hold that Check Investors was a “debt collector,” the court focused on the status of the
collection purposes.” The court added that “[n]o merchant worried about goodwill or the future of
his/her business would have engaged in the [same] kind of conduct.” In fact, “[n]ot only do we
conclude that Appellants are ‘debt collectors’ rather than ‘creditors,’ we believe that their course
of conduct exemplifies why Congress enacted the FDCPA.”
Check Investors’ practices were thus held to be illegal and were arguably unethical. The
imprisonment or that a consumer committed a crime. The prohibition on unfair or
unconscionable practices precludes a debt collector from adding any charge to the underlying
debt unless that charge is authorized by law or the agreement creating the debt.”
(b) Of course, there are, and likely always will be, persons who willfully refuse to pay
legitimate debts. Recognizing this fact, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in this
majority of consumers who obtain credit fully intend to repay their debts. When default occurs, it
is nearly always due to an unforeseen event such as unemployment, overextension, serious
illness or marital difficulties or divorce.”
249A . LEGAL REASONING GROUP ACTIVITYConsumer protections
Of course, dong business in more than one jurisdiction means complying with different sets of
laws. A business would have to adjust its methods accordingly.
(c) Inequitable regulation can lead to inequitable results in similar cases in different
states. This can mean that the citizens of one state are subject to more chicanery on the part of
some unscrupulous merchants and creditors than in other states. But forcing uniform federal
consumer legislation on all of the states would be to extend federal control into an area that has
traditionally been within the states’ prerogative, and could be argued to be unconstitutional.
in whole or in part.
argument that a decision holding debt collectors and their attorneys liable for mistaken
made a mistaken legal interpretation of the act, this would give a competitive advantage to debt
collectors who press the boundaries of lawful conduct. In other words, attorneys would easily
be able to violate the act by making impermissible statements and then later avoid liability by
claiming that the statement represented a mistaken interpretation of the requirements of the act.
The Court agreed with this argument. The Court found it difficult to square such a result with
writing. Would the result have been different? Explain. No. It is not likely that the result in
the Jerman case would have been different if, instead of serving notice on Karen Jerman in
writing, Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich had simply told her about their assumption of
her debt unless she disputed it in writing. The collection agency’s violation of the Federal Debt
Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) was not the form of their notice to Jerman, but requiring her to
4A. How might the ruling in this case affect other collection agencies? When initiating
contact with a debtor to collect a debt, a collection agency must give the debtor a validation
notice that states he or she has thirty days to dispute the debt and request written verification of
it. The ruling in the Jerman case clarifies the terms of the validation notice that collection
careful with the wording of their collection notices.
4 UNIT SIX: GOVERNMENT REGULATION
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website,
in whole or in part.
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS IN THE REVIEWING FEATURE
AT THE END OF THE CHAPTER
1A. Deceptive advertising
The advertising would mislead a reasonable consumer who would show up at the store
expecting the advertised item to be available. This is a classic example of bait and switch
advertisingluring a customer in with a low priced item (the MetroRider EZ, the bait), then
switching his or her interest to a more expensive item (the MetroRider FX).
3A. Credit discrimination
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits the denial of credit solely on the basis of race,
religion, national origin, color, gender, marital status, or age. If the clerk required a cosigner on
Sage’s loan because of her race or gender, a court would likely find that the dealer violated this
ANSWER TO DEBATE THIS QUESTION IN THE REVIEWING FEATURE
AT THE END OF THE CHAPTER
Laws against bait-and-switch advertising should be abolished because no
advertise items, so once in the stores, these consumers may end up paying for higher-priced
versions of the same products. Retailers must be prevented from using such unethical tactics.
CHAPTER 24: CONSUMER LAW 5
in whole or in part.
ANSWERS TO ISSUE SPOTTERS IN THE EXAMPREP FEATURE
1A. United Pharmaceuticals, Inc., believes that it has developed a new drug that will be
effective in the treatment of patients with AIDS. The drug has had only limited testing, but
United wants to make the drug widely available as soon as possible. To market the drug,
what must United show the Food and Drug Administration? Under an extensive set of
2A. Gert buys a notebook computer from EZ Electronics. She pays for it with her credit
card. When the computer proves defective, she asks EZ to re pair or replace it, but EZ
refuses. What can Gert do? Under the Truth-in-Lending Act, a buyer who wishes to withhold
payment for a faulty product purchased with a credit card must follow specific procedures to
settle the dispute. The credit card issuer then must intervene and attempt to settle the dispute.
Andrew will not be required to pay for the cookbook because of federal consumer protection
law. The federal Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 allows Andrew to retain or discard the
cookbook without incurring any obligation, because it was unsolicited merchandise. The mailing
of this unordered cookbook could also be considered an unfair trade practice. (As a California
resident, Andrew is also protected by the California Civil Code, which permits consumers to
the liability of the cardholder to $50 for unauthorized charges made prior to the time the creditor
is notified. There is no liability for any unauthorized charges made after the date of notice. In
the case of the Midtown Department Store credit card stolen on May 31, the $500 charge made
on June 1, which is prior to Ochoa’s notice, causes Ochoa to be liable for the $50 limit. For the
June 3 charge of $200 made after the notification, Ochoa has no liability. TILA also deals with
in whole or in part.
CHAPTER 24: CONSUMER LAW 7
in whole or in part.
judgment in the defendants’ favor, and on the reasoning stated above, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed.
246A. Deceptive advertising
(Chapter 24Page 467)
247A . BUSINESS CASE PROBLEM WITH SAMPLE ANSWERFair debt collection practices
Engler may recover under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Atlantic is subject to
the FDCPA because it is a debt-collection agency and it was attempting to collect a debt on
behalf of Bank of America. Atlantic also used offensive tactics to collect from Engler. After all,
(a) Check Investors argued that the payors were criminals or tortfeasors because they
had written “bad” checks, and that the amounts of the checks were not “debts” because they
arose from criminal or tortious conduct. For the same reasons, asserted Check Investors, the
payors were not “consumers” entitled to protection under the FDCPA. Check Investors also
argued that the FDCPA did not apply because the firm was collecting NSF checks that it had
court echoed the finding that Check Investors had failed to prove the intent required to establish
a crime or tort and added that, even if intent had been shown, the FDCPA had no “fraud”
exception. The court held that even if accepted the contention that the payors were criminals or
tortfeasors, they would still qualify as consumers under the FDCPA.
8 UNIT SIX: GOVERNMENT REGULATION
in whole or in part.
To hold that Check Investors was a “debt collector,” the court focused on the status of the
collection purposes.” The court added that “[n]o merchant worried about goodwill or the future of
his/her business would have engaged in the [same] kind of conduct.” In fact, “[n]ot only do we
conclude that Appellants are ‘debt collectors’ rather than ‘creditors,’ we believe that their course
of conduct exemplifies why Congress enacted the FDCPA.”
Check Investors’ practices were thus held to be illegal and were arguably unethical. The
imprisonment or that a consumer committed a crime. The prohibition on unfair or
unconscionable practices precludes a debt collector from adding any charge to the underlying
debt unless that charge is authorized by law or the agreement creating the debt.”
(b) Of course, there are, and likely always will be, persons who willfully refuse to pay
legitimate debts. Recognizing this fact, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in this
majority of consumers who obtain credit fully intend to repay their debts. When default occurs, it
is nearly always due to an unforeseen event such as unemployment, overextension, serious
illness or marital difficulties or divorce.”
249A . LEGAL REASONING GROUP ACTIVITYConsumer protections
Of course, dong business in more than one jurisdiction means complying with different sets of
laws. A business would have to adjust its methods accordingly.
(c) Inequitable regulation can lead to inequitable results in similar cases in different
states. This can mean that the citizens of one state are subject to more chicanery on the part of
some unscrupulous merchants and creditors than in other states. But forcing uniform federal
consumer legislation on all of the states would be to extend federal control into an area that has
traditionally been within the states’ prerogative, and could be argued to be unconstitutional.

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.