978-1285770178 Case Printout Case CPC-13-08 Part 1

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 15
subject Words 3281
subject Authors Roger LeRoy Miller

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
Md.,2013.
Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. Brock
--- A.3d ----, 2013 WL 1164508 (Md.)
No. 55, Sept. Term 2012.
March 22, 2013.
Background: Borrower brought action against trustee of trust containing securitized deed of trust, against servicing
agent for deed of trust, and against entities that had been appointed to bring foreclosure proceedings, seeking declar-
Reversed and remanded with instructions.
West Headnotes
Mortgages 266 235
266 Mortgages
266V Assignment of Mortgage or Debt
266k234 Transfer of Debt or Obligation Secured
page-pf2
page-pf3
page-pf4
© 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
266k339 Persons Entitled to Execute Power
266k341 k. Under Trust Deed. Most Cited Cases
Servicing agent, the possessor of promissory note indorsed in blank, was the holder of the note entitled to en-
force the note, including by foreclosing deed of trust securing note, regardless of whether questions existed as to
266 Mortgages
266V Assignment of Mortgage or Debt
266k234 Transfer of Debt or Obligation Secured
266k235 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
A deed of trust securing a negotiable promissory note cannot be transferred like a mortgage; rather, the corre-
sponding note may be transferred, and carries with it the security provided by the deed of trust, and thus, once the
note is transferred, the right to enforce the deed of trust follows.
Gary C. Tepper, (Ballard Spahr LLP, Washingotn, D.C.; Robert A. Scott of Ballard Spahr LLP, Baltimore, MD), on
HARRELL, J.
This case arises out of a challenge by a borrower, Respondent Angela Brock (“Brock”), to the authority of vari-
ous individuals and entities to effectuate a valid foreclosure on her residential property. After a foreclosure sale was
scheduled in Montgomery County by the substitute foreclosure trustees, Edward S. Cohn, Stephen N. Goldberg,
Richard E. Solomon, and Richard J. Rogers (referred to collectively as the “Substitute Trustees”), but before the sale
page-pf5
page-pf6
page-pf7
page-pf8
© 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
266k339 Persons Entitled to Execute Power
266k341 k. Under Trust Deed. Most Cited Cases
Servicing agent, the possessor of promissory note indorsed in blank, was the holder of the note entitled to en-
force the note, including by foreclosing deed of trust securing note, regardless of whether questions existed as to
266 Mortgages
266V Assignment of Mortgage or Debt
266k234 Transfer of Debt or Obligation Secured
266k235 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
A deed of trust securing a negotiable promissory note cannot be transferred like a mortgage; rather, the corre-
sponding note may be transferred, and carries with it the security provided by the deed of trust, and thus, once the
note is transferred, the right to enforce the deed of trust follows.
Gary C. Tepper, (Ballard Spahr LLP, Washingotn, D.C.; Robert A. Scott of Ballard Spahr LLP, Baltimore, MD), on
HARRELL, J.
This case arises out of a challenge by a borrower, Respondent Angela Brock (“Brock”), to the authority of vari-
ous individuals and entities to effectuate a valid foreclosure on her residential property. After a foreclosure sale was
scheduled in Montgomery County by the substitute foreclosure trustees, Edward S. Cohn, Stephen N. Goldberg,
Richard E. Solomon, and Richard J. Rogers (referred to collectively as the “Substitute Trustees”), but before the sale

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.