978-1285770178 Case Printout Case CPC-08-04 Part 1

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 13
subject Words 2776
subject Authors Roger LeRoy Miller

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.
William SANTIAGO, a single man, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
agent collided with motorcycle. The Superior Court, Maricopa County, Cause No. C-578406, Daniel E. Nastro, J.,
granted summary judgment for newspaper. Motorcyclist appealed. The Court of Appeals, No. 2 CA-CV 88-0217,
162 Ariz. 86, 781 P.2d 63, affirmed. The Supreme Court, Sarah D. Grant, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals, held that
evidence created jury question as to whether employee-employer relationship existed between newspaper delivery
agent and newspaper.
231H Labor and Employment
231HI In General
231Hk28 Independent Contractors and Their Employees
231Hk29 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
231H Labor and Employment
231HI In General
231Hk22 Nature, Creation, and Existence of Employment Relation
231Hk23 k. In General. Most Cited Cases
page-pf2
page-pf3
page-pf4
© 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
[10] Labor and Employment 231H 58
231H Labor and Employment
231HI In General
231Hk58 k. Questions of Law and Fact as to Employment Status. Most Cited Cases
Law Offices of James F. Brook by James F. Brook, Steven L. Reed, Tempe, for plaintiff-appellant.
Teilborg, Sanders & Parks, P.C. by James A. Teilborg, Jean E. Huffington, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.
jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 20, 1986, a car driven by Frank Frausto (Frausto) collided with a motorcycle driven by Santiago. At
the time Frausto was delivering the Sunday edition of the Arizona Republic on his route for PNI. Santiago filed a
FN1. The trial court granted PNI's motions for summary judgment on the issues of vicarious liability and
negligence in hiring and supervising Frausto as its agent. Santiago does not seek review of the court's deci-
sion on the negligent hiring and supervising claim. Frausto is not a party to this petition.
page-pf5
page-pf6
page-pf7
© 2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
[10] Labor and Employment 231H 58
231H Labor and Employment
231HI In General
231Hk58 k. Questions of Law and Fact as to Employment Status. Most Cited Cases
Law Offices of James F. Brook by James F. Brook, Steven L. Reed, Tempe, for plaintiff-appellant.
Teilborg, Sanders & Parks, P.C. by James A. Teilborg, Jean E. Huffington, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.
jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 20, 1986, a car driven by Frank Frausto (Frausto) collided with a motorcycle driven by Santiago. At
the time Frausto was delivering the Sunday edition of the Arizona Republic on his route for PNI. Santiago filed a
FN1. The trial court granted PNI's motions for summary judgment on the issues of vicarious liability and
negligence in hiring and supervising Frausto as its agent. Santiago does not seek review of the court's deci-
sion on the negligent hiring and supervising claim. Frausto is not a party to this petition.

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.