978-1285770178 Case Printout Case CPC-07-07 Part 1

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 17
subject Words 3166
subject Authors Roger LeRoy Miller

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
S.D.N.Y.,2012.
Dodona I, LLC v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.
847 F.Supp.2d 624 United States District Court,
Background: Investor in residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) issued as part of two synthetic collateral-
ized debt obligations (CDOs) filed putative class action against investment bank, its subsidiary, and bank's officers
alleging securities fraud, common law fraud, and unjust enrichment. Defendants moved to dismiss.
(5) conclusory allegations that investment bank had “artificially inflated” prices were insufficient to plead efficient
market:
(6) complaint stated claim for control person liability against investment bank's subsidiary and bank's officers; and
(7) complaint stated claim for unjust enrichment.
170AVII Pleadings and Motions
170AVII(A) Pleadings in General
170Ak633 Certainty, Definiteness and Particularity
170Ak636 k. Fraud, mistake and condition of mind. Most Cited Cases
Plaintiffs claiming fraud, including securities fraud and common law fraud, must satisfy the heightened plead-
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
page-pf2
© 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
349Bk60.53 k. Misrepresentation. Most Cited Cases
A complaint alleging securities fraud must meet the requirements of PSLRA, specifying each statement alleged
to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the
statement or omission is based on information or belief, complaint must state with particularity all facts on which
that belief is formed. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, § 101(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78u4(b).
[3] Securities Regulation 349B 60.25
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
[4] Securities Regulation 349B 60.18
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b).
[5] Securities Regulation 349B 60.53
349B Securities Regulation
page-pf3
© 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
349Bk60.53 k. Misrepresentation. Most Cited Cases
In order to satisfy requirements of PSLRA and federal rule for pleading fraud, a securities fraud complaint
based on misstatements must: (1) specify the statements that plaintiff contends were fraudulent; (2) identify the
speaker; (3) state where and when the statements were made; and (4) explain why the statements were fraudulent.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, §
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.17 Manipulative, Deceptive or Fraudulent Conduct
349Bk60.28 Nondisclosure; Insider Trading
349Bk60.28(2) Duty to Disclose or Refrain from Trading
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.17 Manipulative, Deceptive or Fraudulent Conduct
[8] Federal Civil Procedure 170A 1831
170A Federal Civil Procedure
170AXI Dismissal
170AXI(B) Involuntary Dismissal
their importance. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
page-pf4
[9] Securities Regulation 349B 60.25
349Bk60.25 k. Fraud on the market; price manipulation. Most Cited Cases
A claim of market manipulation under § 10(b) and Rule 10b5 requires a plaintiff to allege: (1) manipulative
acts, (2) damage, (3) caused by reliance on an assumption of an efficient market free of manipulation, (4) scienter,
(5) in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, (6) furthered by defendant's use of the mails or any facility
of a national securities exchange. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. §
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.17 Manipulative, Deceptive or Fraudulent Conduct
349Bk60.25 k. Fraud on the market; price manipulation. Most Cited Cases
Allegations of misrepresentations or omissions alone cannot support a claim of market manipulation under §
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
349Bk60.51 In General
[12] Securities Regulation 349B 60.45(1)
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
page-pf5
page-pf6
A complaint has sufficiently alleged motive and opportunity to commit fraud, for purposes of stating claim for
securities fraud, if it pleads facts showing that defendant benefited in some concrete and personal way from the pur-
ported fraud. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.43 Grounds of and Defenses to Liability
349Bk60.45 Scienter, Intent, Knowledge, Negligence or Recklessness
349Bk60.45(1) k. In general. Most Cited Cases
The opportunity to commit fraud, as element of claim for securities fraud, is generally assumed where defendant
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
349Bk60.51 In General
[18] Securities Regulation 349B 60.51(2)
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
§ 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
[19] Securities Regulation 349B 60.48(2)
page-pf7
© 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.43 Grounds of and Defenses to Liability
349Bk60.48 Reliance
349Bk60.48(2) k. Nondisclosure. Most Cited Cases
Securities Regulation 349B 60.48(3)
349Bk60.48(3) k. Fraud on the market. Most Cited Cases
Reliance, as element of securities fraud claim, may be presumed in two circumstances: (1) in the case of omis-
sions, reliance on omitted information may be presumed where such information is material, and (2) fraud on the
market theory creates a presumption of reliance if the securities were traded in an efficient market, that is, an open
and developed market in which the price of securities are, in theory, determined by all available information. Securi-
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
349Bk60.51 In General
349Bk60.51(1) k. In general. Most Cited Cases
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
page-pf8
page-pf9
184I Deception Constituting Fraud, and Liability Therefor
205H Implied and Constructive Contracts
205HI Nature and Grounds of Obligation
205HI(A) In General
205Hk2 Constructive or Quasi Contracts
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
bank's own long exposure to subprime risk by betting against CDOs, and that bank had used its subsidiary to serve
as sole credit protection buyer, while knowing that the assets it was selling were toxic and were unlikely to profit
investors. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
[28] Securities Regulation 349B 60.54
349Bk60.54 k. Nondisclosure. Most Cited Cases
Investor's complaint sufficiently alleged that investment bank had made misstatements or omissions of material
fact, as required to state claim for securities fraud with particularity required by PSLRA, by asserting that since bank
had made affirmative representations in offering circulars and marketing book about the risks of investing in its syn-
thetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), it had a duty, beyond boilerplate language, to ensure that those state-
page-pfa
© 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
349Bk60.53 k. Misrepresentation. Most Cited Cases
A complaint alleging securities fraud must meet the requirements of PSLRA, specifying each statement alleged
to have been misleading, the reason or reasons why the statement is misleading, and, if an allegation regarding the
statement or omission is based on information or belief, complaint must state with particularity all facts on which
that belief is formed. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, § 101(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78u4(b).
[3] Securities Regulation 349B 60.25
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
[4] Securities Regulation 349B 60.18
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b).
[5] Securities Regulation 349B 60.53
349B Securities Regulation
© 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
349Bk60.53 k. Misrepresentation. Most Cited Cases
In order to satisfy requirements of PSLRA and federal rule for pleading fraud, a securities fraud complaint
based on misstatements must: (1) specify the statements that plaintiff contends were fraudulent; (2) identify the
speaker; (3) state where and when the statements were made; and (4) explain why the statements were fraudulent.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, §
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.17 Manipulative, Deceptive or Fraudulent Conduct
349Bk60.28 Nondisclosure; Insider Trading
349Bk60.28(2) Duty to Disclose or Refrain from Trading
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.17 Manipulative, Deceptive or Fraudulent Conduct
[8] Federal Civil Procedure 170A 1831
170A Federal Civil Procedure
170AXI Dismissal
170AXI(B) Involuntary Dismissal
their importance. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
[9] Securities Regulation 349B 60.25
349Bk60.25 k. Fraud on the market; price manipulation. Most Cited Cases
A claim of market manipulation under § 10(b) and Rule 10b5 requires a plaintiff to allege: (1) manipulative
acts, (2) damage, (3) caused by reliance on an assumption of an efficient market free of manipulation, (4) scienter,
(5) in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, (6) furthered by defendant's use of the mails or any facility
of a national securities exchange. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. §
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.17 Manipulative, Deceptive or Fraudulent Conduct
349Bk60.25 k. Fraud on the market; price manipulation. Most Cited Cases
Allegations of misrepresentations or omissions alone cannot support a claim of market manipulation under §
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
349Bk60.51 In General
[12] Securities Regulation 349B 60.45(1)
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
A complaint has sufficiently alleged motive and opportunity to commit fraud, for purposes of stating claim for
securities fraud, if it pleads facts showing that defendant benefited in some concrete and personal way from the pur-
ported fraud. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.43 Grounds of and Defenses to Liability
349Bk60.45 Scienter, Intent, Knowledge, Negligence or Recklessness
349Bk60.45(1) k. In general. Most Cited Cases
The opportunity to commit fraud, as element of claim for securities fraud, is generally assumed where defendant
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
349Bk60.51 In General
[18] Securities Regulation 349B 60.51(2)
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
§ 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
[19] Securities Regulation 349B 60.48(2)
© 2012 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.43 Grounds of and Defenses to Liability
349Bk60.48 Reliance
349Bk60.48(2) k. Nondisclosure. Most Cited Cases
Securities Regulation 349B 60.48(3)
349Bk60.48(3) k. Fraud on the market. Most Cited Cases
Reliance, as element of securities fraud claim, may be presumed in two circumstances: (1) in the case of omis-
sions, reliance on omitted information may be presumed where such information is material, and (2) fraud on the
market theory creates a presumption of reliance if the securities were traded in an efficient market, that is, an open
and developed market in which the price of securities are, in theory, determined by all available information. Securi-
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
349Bk60.50 Pleading
349Bk60.51 In General
349Bk60.51(1) k. In general. Most Cited Cases
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
184I Deception Constituting Fraud, and Liability Therefor
205H Implied and Constructive Contracts
205HI Nature and Grounds of Obligation
205HI(A) In General
205Hk2 Constructive or Quasi Contracts
349B Securities Regulation
349BI Federal Regulation
349BI(C) Trading and Markets
349BI(C)7 Fraud and Manipulation
bank's own long exposure to subprime risk by betting against CDOs, and that bank had used its subsidiary to serve
as sole credit protection buyer, while knowing that the assets it was selling were toxic and were unlikely to profit
investors. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 10(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b5.
[28] Securities Regulation 349B 60.54
349Bk60.54 k. Nondisclosure. Most Cited Cases
Investor's complaint sufficiently alleged that investment bank had made misstatements or omissions of material
fact, as required to state claim for securities fraud with particularity required by PSLRA, by asserting that since bank
had made affirmative representations in offering circulars and marketing book about the risks of investing in its syn-
thetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), it had a duty, beyond boilerplate language, to ensure that those state-

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.