introduce two compelling models for a physical definition of attractiveness: Facial Averaging
and Geometric Profiling.
Facial averaging is a line of research exploring facial attractiveness through the
amalgamation of facial characteristics and features. In other words, researchers take
large numbers of human faces and average them together to create the face that most
closely resembles all of them. Lisa DeBruine and Ben Jones, a pair of experimental
psychologists at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland, have a great website devoted to
this type of study (http://www.faceresearch.org). Consider bringing the website up in
class and mixing combinations of faces and ask students to rate them on attractiveness.
What is interesting is that facial averaging tends to produce a facial structure that is rated
as more attractive regardless of race or culture. Visiting the website in class allows for
students to merge pictures together.
Another interesting line of research has attempted to quantify facial attractiveness. There
are several different variants of this research, but I want to spend a few minutes talking
about one in particular: Marquardt Beauty Analysis (http://www.beautyanalysis.com/).
MBA defines attractiveness mathematically based on facial dimensions and geometry.
MBA uses a ratio known as phi (1.618:1), also known as the “Golden ratio.” This ratio
seems be consistently present in things that are seen as beautiful. What is interesting
about the human facial geometry based on the phi ratio (also known as the mask) is that
individuals who have facial structures that closely conform to the mask are consistently
rated as more attractive regardless of race or culture. If you have an interest in it, the
website actually provides instructions downloadable printouts of the mask so that you can
compare your facial structure to the mask itself. Of course, the mask won’t tell you
whether you’re beautiful or not—your loved ones do that.
After reviewing both techniques, return to the idiom, “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” Is it
true, false, or a bit of both?
SUPPLEMENTAL FILMS AND VIDEO
A World of Gestures (1991, 30 minutes)
In this video, international differences in gestures, and cultural differences in nonverbal
communication, are discussed. The video examines gestures that display anger, friendliness,
openness, obscenities, and other gestures that communicate emotion. In addition, the video
examines the development of gestures in children, and gestures used by gangs and secret
organizations.
Ability Issues in the U.S. (1992, 60 minutes)
This instructional video discusses the culture of the disabled, issues of accessibility, and
problems of social interaction. The video also suggests what society must do in order to provide
people with disabilities with the same opportunities available to other citizens.