Add. Case: U.S. v. Anthony (1st Cir., 2008)–In 1998, Anthony and his spouse filed a joint tax
return with zeros entered for income and taxes owed. They received a refund for all taxes
withheld. They attached a statement that they had no duty to pay federal income tax or to file a
return and that it had been a mistake for them to file returns in earlier years. They filed an all
zero tax return in 1999 and no returns after that. During that time, Anthony opened a bank
account in Cyprus and transferred $870,000 to it. In 2004, learning that a criminal investigation
was underway, he began to file overdue returns and pay what was owed, although he stated to
the IRS that it was his belief he owed nothing. Despite filing back returns, he was convicted of
tax evasion and sentenced to 33 months in prison. The court held that Anthony was willfully
blind to his obligations and an enhanced sentence was appropriate. He appealed.
Decision: Affirmed. The evidence supported that Anthony was willfully blind. He recognized the
likelihood that he was in violation of the law, yet proceeded. A willful blindness instruction is
appropriate if: 1) the defendant claims a lack of knowledge, 2) the facts suggest a conscious
course of deliberate ignorance, and 3) the instruction cannot be misunderstood as mandating an
inference of knowledge. His actions indicated a voluntary, intentional violation of a known legal
duty. This is true in most income tax evasion cases. The fact that Anthony had a bunch of
material that stated that people do not have to pay taxes on income carried no weight and need
not be allowed in evidence.
Telephone and Telemarketing Fraud—Several statutes and general consumer protection laws
cover a wide range of scams that use electronic communications as part of the contract with
consumers. False statements include making it appear that a charity is involved when it is not.
Wire Fraud—Almost any illegal activity involving electronic communication can bring in federal
authorities with the hook of interstate communication used to further illegal activities. This is a
sweeping statute that includes e-mail communication. In 2010, the S.Ct. (Skilling v. U.S.) struck
down the failure to provide “honest services” part of the statute as too vague. Kickbacks, bribes,
and other such acts are often accomplished via “wire.”
Add. Case: U.S. v. Vucko (7th Cir., 2007)–Vucko worked in bookkeeping for Northwest
Building. Over a period of years, she stole $700,000 from her employer by “refunding” credit
charges to her bank account. She did not report that income on her tax returns. She was
convicted of wire fraud for the theft and for making false statements in tax returns. The trial
court imposed concurrent sentences of two years’ prison for each offense plus restitution. Vucko
appealed, contending the trial court failed to group the charges so they would be considered a
single offense.
Decision: Affirmed. Vucko’s actions of stealing money and not reporting the income to the IRS
were related, but it would not be appropriate to group these actions as one. The offenses had
International Perspective: White-Collar Crime in France
Under the French Penal Code, corporate crimes are rare. It must be shown that the corporate act
was ordered by the board o directors or senior managers. Illegal acts committed by others within
the organization cannot be attributed to the organization, as can happen in the U.S.
Business Implications from Money Laundering—Focus here is on one of the many areas just
reviewed in brief—money laundering—and how it impacts normal business operations. More