© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2018. All rights reserved.
Solutions Manual, Chapter 12 33
Exercise 12-16 (30 minutes)
1. The relevant costs of a hunting trip would be:
ravel expense (100 miles @ $0.21 per mile) $21
This answer assumes that Bill would not be drinking the bottle of
The money lost in the poker game is not relevant because Bill would
2. If Bill gets lucky and bags another two ducks, all of his costs are likely to
be the same as they were on his last trip. Therefore, it doesn’t cost him
3. In a decision of whether to give up hunting entirely, more of the costs
listed by John are relevant. If Bill did not hunt, he would not need to
pay for: gas, oil, and tires; shotgun shells; the hunting license; and the
These three requirements illustrate the slippery nature of costs. A cost
that is relevant in one situation can be irrelevant in the next. None of
the costs are relevant when we compute the cost of bagging two
T