Chapter 21 – Taxes, Inflation, and Investment Strategy
Tax shelters are means of postponing taxes as long as possible. One can’t get rid of taxes, one
can only postpone them. The discussion on tax shelters contains general discussion of the
benefits of using shelters as well as descriptions the major tax shelter accounts that are generally
available. Performance of some shelters such as a traditional IRA depends in part on variability
in tax rates and differences in tax rates during the accumulation phase as well the retirement
phase.
Spreadsheet 21.5 Savings with a Flat Tax and IRA Style Tax Shelter
This spreadsheet redoes sheet 21.4 with the tax shelter. It still uses a flat tax rate. All funds in
the retirement account are subject to taxation. Total lifetime taxes increases from $2.1 million to
$2.5 million. This increase occurs because one earns more on their investments without the tax
drain so the investor pay more taxes ($3.7 million versus $1.9 million before). The real annuity
is increased from $37,882 to $76,052. There is a large value to the shelter. Taxes on income
during the working years reduce the future value of the investments dramatically.
Spreadsheet 21.7, IRA with a Progressive Tax Code
The real annuity is increased considerably in this case; it is now up to $83,380. This is better than
with a flat tax rate for the reasons noted above.
5. A Menu of Tax Shelters
PPT 21-16 through PPT 21-23
Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) were created by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Current
rules allow investors to contribute up to $5,000 per year to a retirement account. Individuals age
50 and older may contribute another $1,000 per year. There is a 10% tax penalty for withdrawal
of funds prior to age 59 ½ and the investor must begin withdrawals by age 70 ½. Any
withdrawals before age 59 ½ are subject to the ordinary income tax rate and a 10% tax penalty.
There are various hardship exclusions to the tax penalty however, including one for first time
homebuyers. Actually withdrawing the money for this reason would be a bad idea however
because one would lose the compound value of the money withdrawn (unless the house grows in
value at the same rate or more).