Chapter 11 ‒ The International Monetary System
11–10
Copyright © 2019 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
terms of trade balance adjustments, critics question the closeness of the link between the
exchange rate and the trade balance. The case for floating exchange rates has two main
elements: monetary policy autonomy and automatic trade balance adjustments. In terms
of the former, it is argued that a floating exchange rate regime gives countries monetary
policy autonomy. Under a fixed rate system, a country’s ability to expand or contract its
money supply as it sees fit is limited by the need to maintain exchange rate parity. In
terms of the latter, under the Bretton Woods system, if a country developed a permanent
deficit in its balance of trade that could not be corrected by domestic policy, the IMF
would agree to a currency devaluation. Critics of this system argue that the adjustment
mechanism works much more smoothly under a floating exchange rate regime. They
argue that if a country is running a trade deficit, the imbalance between the supply and
demand of that country’s currency in the foreign exchange markets will lead to
depreciation in its exchange rate. An exchange rate depreciation should correct the trade
deficit by making the country’s exports cheaper and its imports more expensive. It is a
matter of personal opinion in regard to which system is better for an international
business. We do know, however, that a fixed exchange rate regime modeled along the
lines of the Bretton Woods system will not work. Nevertheless, a different kind of fixed
exchange rate system might be more enduring and might foster the kind of stability that
would facilitate more rapid growth in international trade and investment.
QUESTION 5: Imagine that Canada, the United States, and Mexico decide to adopt a
fixed exchange rate system. What would be the likely consequences of such a system for
(a) international businesses, and (b) the flow of trade and investment among the three
countries?
ANSWER 5: Were North America to adopt a common currency, it would become
increasingly attractive for foreign investment and would increase trade and investment
QUESTION 6: Reread the Country Focus on the U.S. dollar, oil prices, and recycling
petrodollars, then answer the following questions:
a. What will happen to the value of the U.S. dollar if oil producers decide to invest most
of their earnings from oil sales in domestic infrastructure projects?
b. What factors determine the relative attractiveness of the dollar-, euro-, and yen-
denominated assets to oil producers flush with petrodollars? What might lead them to
direct more funds toward non-dollar-denominated assets?
c. What will happen to the value of the U.S. dollar if OPEC members decide to invest
more of their petrodollars toward non-dollar-denominated assets, such as euro-
denominated stocks and bonds?
d. In addition to oil producers, China is also accumulating a large stock of dollars,
currently estimated to total $3.3 trillion. What would happen to the value of the dollar if