Teaching Note —Infosys Consulting in the U.S.—What to Do Now?
5
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction, distribution, or posting online without the prior written consent
of McGraw-Hill Education.
services. Deloitte is placed closest to HP enterprise solutions, because the two firms compete head-to-
head for many government contracts. There is a second cluster of firms that are clearly major interna-
tional players, but which have focused more specifically in the technology services area. These include
HP enterprise Services, IBM, and the three major Indian companies (Tata, Wipro IT, and Infosys).
Among these, IBM is the largest, whereas HP enterprise Services has one of the broadest IT service
portfolios in the industry. Wipro, Tata, and Infosys are somewhat less diversified and have less of a
global reach. Infosys in particular has been heavily focused in North America. The blue dots in the bot-
tom left-hand corner represent the over 300,000 boutique or enterprise-level firms in the IT consulting
industry. They offer a more limited set of services over a much narrower geographic area, but success-
fully meet the needs of many small-to-medium-sized firms.
The dashed green lines indicate that there are significant mobility barriers (economies of scale) pre-
venting boutique firms from becoming global IT service providers. Another set of mobility barriers
(economies of scale, access to clients) makes it difficult for the global IT service providers to enter other
consulting areas.
4. How might culture play a role in Infosys’s ability to formulate and implement a successful
strategy for its U.S. consulting arm?
Hofstede’s cultural dimensions may be considered microfoundations that influence how strate-
gic leaders formulate and implement strategic plans. Being aware of cultural differences is especially
important when engaging in international business, as it helps managers understand the national insti-
Comparing the two countries across the five dimensions reveals that the United States and India
have similar scores with respect to uncertainty avoidance and masculinity/femininity. This indicates
that people from both countries have moderate tolerance for ambiguity and fairly similar preferences
The United States, however, scores significantly higher than India on the individualism/collectiv-
ism dimension. In fact, the United States ranks highest in individualism amongst all the countries
studied by Hofstede. This means that U.S. managers typically prioritize task over relationships, and