Strategic Management 3
e
Instructor Manual
STRATEGY SMART VIDEO LECTURE
POWERPOINT SLIDES 62 AND 27
The Tata/Starbucks example in this slide’s video is an example of a cross-border alliance and can be tied into the Tata
example from Chapter 8. It can be used to start a discussion of the advantages that the JV brings to each firm.
9.2 Strategic Alliances LO 9–4
POWERPOINT SLIDES 28–30
EXAMPLES
POWERPOINT SLIDE 28
NEWER FACULTY: Students need to understand that any relationships must be managed well in order to prolong the life
expectancy of it. Careful selection of partners to see if they have cultural fit, complementary assets, and willingness is
important. Once entered into the alliance relationship, firms need to establish trust by acquiring information and knowledge
from each other so participating firms will have the chance to enhance their understandings of one another.
POWERPOINT SLIDE 29
International Paper’s strategic alliance with a Russian partner in Siberia offers a good opportunity to discuss the advantages
of having local partners when entering a new, unfamiliar geographic territory. Ask students what benefits this investment
brings to Russia, to the Russian partners, and to International Paper. In what ways are the interests of the partners aligned?
What factors should IP consider in managing the alliance? (See “International Paper’s big pulp bet hits a frosty Siberia”
7/17/13 The Wall Street Journal.) The example also illustrates operating challenges in one of the important BRIC countries.
There is a video associated with the article that discusses the reasons behind the investment in Siberia as well as the
challenges of doing business in Siberia. You could follow this video with a discussion about how a Russian partner might
help manage and mitigate some of these risks.
POWERPOINT SLIDE 30
Star Alliance provides an example to illustrate the importance of balancing cooperation and competition in a strategic alliance
of competitors. Lufthansa invited Turkish Airlines to join the alliance to access passengers in its Istanbul hub. The alliance
spurred rapid growth at Turkish and Turkish is now aggressively competing with Lufthansa on European routes. You can use
this example to discuss the importance of compatible strategic goals among the partners and also the challenges of managing
alliances among firms that compete actively with each other. (See “At airline alliance, competition heats up” 11/29/12 The
Wall Street Journal.)
Research Update
Diestre, L. and Rajagopalan, N. (2012), Are all ‘sharks’ dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D
alliances.
Strat. Mgmt. J.,
33: 1115–1134. doi: 10.1002/smj.1978
EXPERIENCED FACULTY: This research article would be a nice complement to a discussion of the risks of knowledge
appropriation in an alliance, sometimes referred to as “swimming with the sharks.” It looks at the dilemma new
technology firms face when choosing an alliance partner between needing access to the resources offered by larger,
established firms (value creation) and risking that their own knowledge will be appropriated by their larger alliance
partner (value appropriation) and how this tension influences alliance formation. The researchers find that the likelihood
of an alliance formation is positively influenced by the technological relatedness of the work of the new business and the
larger incumbent and by the product development experience of the larger firm (value creation opportunity). This positive
effect is negatively impacted by the applicability of the new business’ knowledge to the larger firm and the diversity of
the larger firm’s products (the incentive of the larger firm to appropriate the knowledge of the new business).