Extended Discussion
P&G is a firm with a long history of success with a differentiation strategy that has had difficulty adapting to a change
in the external environment (see “P&G CEO takes responsibility for company’s performance” S Ng 10/13/15 The Wall
Street Journal and “Procter & Gamble sales dip, but profit rises” S Ng and C Dulaney10/23/15 The Wall Street
Journal). The fact that it is a diversified firm gives you an opportunity to draw the distinction that diversified firms can
set a unique business-level strategy for each industry in which they participate. It might help the students to apply the
chapter concepts better if you ask them to focus for this discussion on a particular product-market business, for example
U.S. laundry detergent. In this market, P&G dominates the high end of the market with a proliferation of incrementally
different Tide products. They have a very strong position in the mid-tier of the market with Gain, Cheer, and Era.
During the recent extended recession, consumers have been moving from the top– and mid-tier to the lowest tier of the
market, causing a loss of market share and profitability for P&G. P&G expected that trend to reverse as the economy
recovered, but it has not done so. P&G’s high marketing intensity and R&D intensity make it difficult for them to
compete on price with the cost leaders.
P&G is pursuing a differentiation strategy. Looking at the value and cost drivers discussed in this chapter and
performance, and brand reputation for price savings that impacted most of the five forces listed in Exhibit 6.7. In the
industry structure, we have seen a rise of new entrants, both those focused on a segment that places a high value on
sustainable, natural products and in private-label store brands. As sales shifted from P&G to store brands, P&G’s
negotiating power with its direct customers (retailers) declined.
P&G has cut its R&D spending, cut other costs, and reduced staffing. Does the firm risk being “stuck in the
middle”? Why or why not? If yes, why would being “stuck in the middle” be a bad strategic position?
Even cutting its R&D and advertising costs, P&G will still be higher cost than private label products. Reductions in the
can be destructive to long-term profitability.
Your task is to help the new CEO, David Taylor, sharpen P&G’s strategic position. Which strategic position
should P&G stake out? Which value and/or cost drivers would you focus on to improve P&G’s strategic profile?
How would you go about it? What results would you expect?
version of Tide among its mid-tier offerings, in the hopes that this will cause the consumers who have traded down to
the lowest-tier products to come back up to mid-tier P&G products. The new product will be called Tide Simply Clean
and Fresh and will be marketed in a yellow container, rather than orange, and separated on the retailer shelves from
other Tide products. With the lowest-tier market retailing for 7 cents per load and Tide retailing for 20 cents per load,
P&G’s risk of margin cannibalization from this strategy are very high. (See “P&G unveils plan for a budget Tide” The
Wall Street Journal 9/4/13.) AACSB 2015 Standard 9 Application of knowledge and Framing problems and developing
creative solutions