Extended Discussion
You may want to offer the students some contrasting examples of firms within the same industry that have either
responded successfully or failed to respond successfully to changes in their competitive environment. We expect most
students have shopped in a Circuit City store and they also have probably been in a Best Buy and have purchased
products online through firms such as Amazon. We can also draw parallels here to Borders and Barnes & Nobles,
though Borders never reached the “great” status of a Circuit City. Blockbuster can be compared with Netflix also. One
key point we like to bring out in class discussion is that though Best Buy (and Barnes & Noble) survived thus far, their
future success is far from certain. We use these points to have a class discussion about shopping online versus in brick
and mortar stores. What do brick and mortar stores need to do to be successful in this retail environment? What skills
and resources do they need for success going forward? Students often find this an engaging discussion and many will
have extensive ideas on how brick stores can survive and even thrive.
activities that the firm excels at) that enabled it to create a higher economic value than its competitors. In particular,
Circuit City created world-class competencies in efficient and effective logistics expertise: It deployed sophisticated
point-of-sale and inventory-tracking technology, supported by IT investments that enabled the firm to connect the flow
of information among geographically dispersed stores. This expertise in turn allowed detailed tracking of customer
preferences and thus enabled Circuit City to respond quickly to changing trends. The company also relied on highly
motivated, well-trained sales personnel to provide superior service and thus build and maintain customer loyalty. These
core competencies enabled Circuit City to implement a “4S business model”—service, selection, savings, and
Circuit City’s core competencies lost value because the firm neglected to upgrade and protect them and was thus
outflanked by Best Buy and online retailers like Amazon. Moreover, Circuit City’s top-management team was also
distracted by alternatives to video rentals through its proprietary DivX DVD player and an attempted merger with
Blockbuster (which filed for bankruptcy in 2010). Perhaps the biggest blunder that Circuit City’s top-management team
committed was to lay off 3,000 of the firm’s highest-paid sales personnel. The layoff was done to become more cost-
competitive with Best Buy and, in particular, the burgeoning online retailers. The problem was that the highest-paid
“customer–centricity” model, based on a set of skills that allowed its store employees to identify and more effectively
serve specific customer segments.
Why did Circuit City lose its competitive advantage? Circuit City failed to upgrade and protect their competencies,
which resulted in their losing customers to firms such as Best Buy and Amazon. It may be that the senior leaders of
Circuit City were distracted with other (newer) businesses like CarMax. What could Circuit City’s management have
What is the future of Best Buy as the leader in big-box electronic retailing? What resources and capabilities will
positively impact its future? The future of Best Buy is uncertain since it faces competition with online retailers like
Amazon, even with the development of the innovative “customer–centricity” model. Through the recruitment of
previous Circuit City employees with extensive strategic knowledge, Best Buy has a great base of resources and
capabilities that may provide a basis for competitive advantage, but they will need to continue evolving to compete
with online commerce.