Strategic Management 3
e
Instructor Manual
EXERCISE
You can illustrate the impacts of new entrants, substitutes, and complements with a pizza example. Form four groups of
students: new entrants, substitutes, complements, and focal industry rivals. Bring three pizzas (one smaller than the other two
and one of the larger ones a different type than the other) to class. Caution students not to eat pizza until teaching is done!
Hand the smaller pizza to the industry rivals. Explain the drivers of rivalry intensity and what consequences that has for how
evenly and civilly the pie is shared among all of the hungry incumbents. Hand one of the larger pizzas to the complements
industry; explain how as the complements industry grows the size of pie available to the focal industry rivals grows. Ask
someone in the complements industry to swap out the focal industry’s small pie for the bigger one. Hand one pizza to the
substitutes industry and explain how they are a separate industry that has its own profits, but in this case they are close
substitutes for the focal industry. The substitute industry begins to take customers/profit from the focal industry. Ask
someone from the substitutes industry to take a piece of pizza from the focal industry. Explain that new entrants are firms
who are not in the focal industry, but decide to enter it. Send a student from the new entrants team over to the focal industry
team and tell them to take a piece of pizza. Discuss the impact of the lost pieces of the focal industry pie on the original
incumbents. Then let the students eat your teaching materials!
A way to assess critical reasoning skills is to assign students a five forces model of an industry, then ask students to explicitly
assess each of the driving forces listed in Exhibit 3.4. For one force that has some drivers that are strong and some that are
weak, ask students to justify how they weighed those competing factors to reach a conclusion. If you choose the
pharmaceutical industry, you can assign this article “For prescription drug makers, price increases drive revenue” (J Walker
10/6/15 The Wall Street Journal). It provides a good alternative to the soft drink industry as a profitable industry due to weak
forces. Two factors that should come out of the discussion are strong patent protection (see Chapter 7), a regulatory system
3.2 Industry Structure and Firm Strategy LO 3–3
POWERPOINT SLIDES 35–41
EXAMPLES
The structure-conduct-performance model has the benefit of simplicity compared with the five forces model, BUT it is also a
bit harder for students to grasp as it is a continuum and may not always yield “black & white” answers. One such example:
Although undifferentiated agricultural products are commodities leading to a perfect competitive market structure, farmers
have noted the demographic trend toward organic food. The demand for organic milk far outstrips supply, and allows dairy
companies to command a 50–100 percent price premium over non-organic milk. The dairy producers now enjoy some pricing
power as a result of their differentiated product.
NEWER FACULTY: An example of a U.S. oligopoly might be the accounting firm industry. In contrast, the U.S. personal
injury attorney industry is much more fragmented and rivalry is more intense. You can expand this contrasting example by
asking students how competition within each industry to hire the best accounting graduates or the best law school graduates
differs due to industry structure.
While natural monopolies appear to be disappearing from the competitive landscape, so-called near monopolies are of much
greater interest to strategists. These near monopolies are firms that have accomplished product differentiation to such a
degree that they are in a class by themselves, just like a monopolist. Intel, with its 80 percent market share in semiconductors,
is a near monopoly. Discuss the impacts on both the semiconductor industry and the industry of its largest buyers, such as PC
manufacturers.
The European Union, for example, views Intel (with its 80 percent market share in semiconductors) as a near monopoly. This
is an enviable position in terms of the ability to extract profits, so long as Intel can steer clear of monopolistic behavior,
which may attract antitrust regulators and lead to legal repercussions.