Extended Discussion
POWERPOINT SLIDE 34
EXPERIENCED FACULTY: Many observers place the blame for HP’s loss in competitive advantage and stellar reputation
squarely on its board of directors because of major strategic errors committed over the last decade. Consider the turbulence
in HP’s CEO office. Carly Fiorina was fired due to loss of confidence after poor competitive performance post-Compaq
merger. Mark Hurd improved the firm’s performance, but then engaged in unethical behavior and was replaced by Leo
Apotheker. Apotheker led the company poorly and was replaced after only 11 months, following a huge decline in
shareholder value (show a 10–year chart of HP’s stock price relative to the S&P 500). Meg Whitman has had trouble getting
the firm to perform competitively and has flip–flopped on the strategic issue of whether to separate the consumer-based PC
and printer businesses from the enterprise parts of the business. HP’s recent history demonstrates the difficult decisions that
a board of directors must make when governing a public company: How should a company deal with a situation in which
internal stakeholders leak sensitive information to outsiders? Should the board force a highly successful CEO to resign
when ethical shortcomings are discovered but before an investigation proves or disproves illegal behavior? Would the
much action in one boardroom makes it an interesting discussion topic for this chapter.
Who has been to blame for HP’s shareholder value destruction—the CEO, the board of directors, or both? What
Meg Whitman asserted for years that the firm’s turnaround efforts were being slowed by long-term underinvestment in new
product development. Both the board and past CEOs should be held accountable for that. Shareholders can (and have) sued
HP. Shareholders can continue to “vote with their feet” and sell their positions or refuse to purchase HP shares going
forward.
values going forward, but the culture needs to be reformed to value compliance with the value system. Perhaps part of the
problem was the extensive acquisition efforts of the firm—Compaq, Tandy, Digital Equipment, Autonomy, to name but a
few. These serial major horizontal acquisitions and the accompanying process of continuous layoffs and reorganizations
may have sapped the coherence of the culture. It could be reinvigorated with new artifacts and stronger norms through a
socialization process (see Chapter 11). You might want to bring the class discussion back to topics covered in Chapter 2.
Ms. Whitman entered a company in crisis with demoralized employees and a seeming loss of strategic focus. Positive
actions in that situation would have been to prioritize the internally oriented roles of strategic leadership, such as leader,
monitor, disseminator, and resource allocator. Using these roles to gather the pertinent background from key employees, she
around. Given the firm’s strong performance under Hurd’s leadership, was the decision by the board of directors to force
Mr. Hurd to resign right or wrong?
Discuss the general lessons in terms of corporate governance and business ethics that can be drawn from HP’s last
decade. Students can find a variety of answers here but some of the areas to focus on are the following: Clearly HP is a case
organization!