Extended Discussion
POWER POINT SLIDE 53
EXPERIENCED FACULTY: Location remains central to competition. Today’s economic map of the world is characterized
by what Porter calls clusters: critical masses in one place of linked industries and institutions, from suppliers to
universities to government agencies, which enjoy unusual competitive success in a particular field. If globalization and
drastic advancements in technology indeed reduce the importance of firm location, what accounts for the thriving clusters
of computer technology firms in Silicon Valley, medical device firms in the Chicago area, and biotechnology firms in
Boston? Known for their engineering prowess, car companies such as Daimler, BMW, Audi, and Porsche are clustered in
southern Germany. High-performance Formula One racecars are designed and crafted in England’s Motor Sport Valley,
near London. Many fashion-related companies (clothing, shoes, and accessories) are located in northern Italy. Singapore
is a well-known cluster for semiconductor materials. India’s leading BPO firms are in Bangalore. Porter captures this
phenomenon succinctly: “Paradoxically, the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in
local things—knowledge, relationships, and motivation that distant rivals cannot match.”
The Research Triangle Park (RTP) in North Carolina is bounded by the cities of Chapel Hill, Durham, and Raleigh.
Several important cluster ingredients are readily apparent: top-notch research universities (The University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Duke University, and North Carolina State University); well-known MNEs (BASF, Bayer, Cisco
Systems, Ericsson, and IBM, among others); good interstate highway connections; and an international airport. The RTP
has one of the highest concentrations of PhDs worldwide, and it continues to attract the brightest students, researchers,
and knowledge workers from around the world. The RTP contains two distinct clusters, a biopharma cluster and a
communications–technology cluster. These two clusters are anchored by U.S. and foreign MNEs. The RTP’s resident
new-venture creation because VCs provide not only capital but also strategic and technical assistance. Leading venture
capital firms such as Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers (KPCB) in Silicon Valley tend to actively recruit managers,
lawyers, suppliers, and customers for its portfolio companies. Because relationships between venture capitalists and their
portfolio companies tend to be deep and extensive, venture capitalists generally prefer to fund ventures that are located
nearby, mostly within the regional cluster. KPCB, for example, provided early-stage funding for Electronic Arts, Google,
Genentech, Genomic Health, Intuit, Sun Microsystems, and VeriSign—all located in Silicon Valley.
between technology clusters in the U.S. market and those in emerging markets, such as Africa. You could use this video
as a basis for students to have a theory-based discussion of how a multinational firm, such as Apple, Ford, IBM, or GE
might use this information to develop a global R&D strategy. Should they participate in emerging market technology
clusters? Why or why not? If so, which countries should they enter for this purpose? What is the best way for them to
learn from these clusters or benefit from the ideas generated?