23
Section 2 Using a Strategy Simulation in Your Course
The comparative amount (relative to rival brands) of merchandising and promotional support that a company
oerstoitsretailersrelativetotheaverageamountsoeredindustry-wide.
The relative aggressiveness with which a company promotes online purchases at its website.
The extent to which the buyers of a company’s brand of footwear remain loyal to repurchasing that same
brand.
Any and all competitive strategy options—low-costleadership,dierentiation,best-costprovider,focusedlow-
cost,andfocuseddierentiation—are viable choices for pursuing better company performance and competitive
advantage in the branded footwear segment. There’s no built-in bias favoring any one strategy and no “secret
set of strategic moves or decision combinations” that are sure to result in a company becoming the industry
leader. A company can try to gain an edge over rivals in the branded footwear segment with more advertising
orawiderselectionofmodelsormoreappealingstyling/qualityorbiggerrebatesorsecuringmoreappealing
celebrity endorsements, and so on. It can focus sales eorts on one or two geographic regions or strive to
build strong market positions in all four geographic regions. It can pursue essentially the same branded strategy
worldwideorcraftslightlyorverydierentstrategiesforeachofthefourgeographicregions.Itcanputmore
or less emphasis on selling branded shoes to footwear retailers as opposed to selling to individual consumers at
the company’s Web site. Most any well-conceived, well-executed competitive approach in branded footwear is
capable of succeeding, provided it is not overpowered by the opposing strategies of competitors or defeated by
the presence of too many copycat strategies that dilute its effectiveness.
However, vigorous price competition prevails in the private-label segment. For obvious reasons, chain retailers
prefertosourcetheirrequirementsforprivate-labelfootwearfromcompaniesoeringthebest(lowestprices).
Companies desirous of winning a contract to supply private-label footwear to chain retailers across the world
mustfirstagreetoproduceshoesthatmeetglobally-setbuyerspecificationsforqualityandvarietyofmodels/
styles.Thentheymustbesuccessfulinbiddingagainstrivalcompaniesforcontracts.Companiesoeringto
supplyspecifiedquantitiesofprivate-labelfootwearwithlowerpricebidsareawardedcontractsovercompanies
that bid higher prices. A low-cost, low-price strategy is thus mandatory in the private-label segment if a company
expectstobeprofitable(butthisdoesnotrequirepursuingthesamestrategyinthebrandedsegment).
How the Outcomes Are Determined
Instructors specify a deadline (date and time) for company co-managers to complete for each decision round
andotherrelatedassignments.Instructorshavetheexibilitytochangethedeadlinesatanytimeforanyreason.
Decision rounds can be scheduled once per week, twice per week, daily, or even twice daily, depending on how
youwanttoconducttheexercise.Youwillbeabletoperusesampledecisionscheduleswhenyouaresettlingon
the times and dates for the deadlines.
Whentheinstructor-specifieddeadlineforadecisionroundarrives,theBSG algorithms allocate sales and market
shares to the competing companies, region by region. How many branded pairs a company sells in a geographic
region is governed by:
For instance, a company’s branded footwear price in a region is determined to be more competitive the further
it is below the average price in that region charged by all companies and less competitive the further it is
abovetheregionalaverage.Acompany’sstyling/qualityisdeterminedtobemorecompetitivethefurtherits
styling/qualityratingisabovetheaveragestyling/qualityratingofallcompaniescompetingintheregionand
less competitive the further its rating is below the industry average in the region. The overall competitiveness