Chapter 12 – Pure Monopoly
12-2
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written
consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Patents and licenses are legal barriers to entry that also, to some extent, are justifiable. If
inventions were not protected at all from immediate copying by those who bore none of
the costs, the urge to invent and innovate would be lessened and the costly secrecy that is
enforced already would have to be much greater and more costly. However, this does not
mean that abuses do not exist in the present system and a case can be made for reducing
the present seventeen years for which patents are granted.
Ownership of essential raw materials is another barrier to entry. It has little social
justification except to the extent that the hope of gaining a monopoly in the supply of an
essential raw material leads to more prospecting. The Last Word on De Beers is an
example.
Unfair competition is the last of the barriers and has no social justification at all, which is
why price-cutting to bankrupt a rival is illegal. The problem here, though, is to prove that
cutthroat competition truly is what it appears to be.
3. How does the demand curve faced by a purely monopolistic seller differ from that confronting
a purely competitive firm? Why does it differ? Of what significance is the difference? Why is the
pure monopolist’s demand curve not perfectly inelastic? LO3