Communication Case 18–10
You may wish to suggest to your students that they consult the FASB 1990
Discussion Memorandum, “Distinguishing between Liability and Equity
Instruments and Accounting for Instruments with Characteristics of Both,” which
sets forth the most common arguments on the issues in this case. Or, you may
prefer that they think for themselves and approach the issue from scratch.
There is no right or wrong answer. Both views can and often are convincingly
defended. The process of developing and synthesizing the arguments likely will be
more beneficial than any single solution. Each student should benefit from
participating in the process, interacting first with his or her partner, then with the
class as a whole. It is important that each student actively participate in the
process. Domination by one or two individuals should be discouraged.
A significant benefit of this case is that it forces students’ consideration and
acceptance of the fact that both liabilities and equities are claims to an enterprise’s
assets. It also requires them to carefully consider the profession’s definitions of
those elements. Arguments brought out in the FASB DM include the following:
Arguments Supporting View 1:
Some students likely will argue that convertible bonds and other similar
instruments can be appropriately classified in the two existing categories on the
basis of existing distinctions and definitions. For instance, they might focus on
the characteristic of a liability that requires that the enterprise issuing it have
little or no discretion to avoid the future sacrifice of economic benefits.
Concepts Statement 6 defines liabilities as:
. . . probable future sacrifices of economic benefits arising from present
obligations of a particular entity to transfer assets or provide services to other
entities in the future as a result of past transactions or events. [paragraph 35]
Three essential characteristics of a liability are:
a. It embodies a present duty or responsibility to one or more other entities for
b. The duty or responsibility obligates a particular entity, leaving it little or no
c. The transaction or other event obligating the entity has already happened.