CHAPTER 7 C-1
CHAPTER 7
BUNYAN LUMBER, LLC
The company is faced with the option of when to harvest the lumber. Whatever harvest cycle the
company chooses, it will follow that cycle in perpetuity. Since the forest was planted 20 years ago,
the options available in the case are 40-, 45-, 50, and 55-year harvest cycles. No matter what harvest
cycle the company chooses, it will always thin the timber 20 years after harvests and replants. The
cash flows will grow at the inflation rate, so we can use the real or nominal cash flows. In this case,
it is simpler to use real cash flows, although nominal cash flows would yield the same result. So, the
real required return on the project is:
The conservation funds are expected to grow at a slower rate than inflation, so the real return for the
conservation fund will be:
The company will thin the forest today regardless of the harvest schedule, so this first thinning is not
an incremental cash flow, but future thinning is part of the analysis since the thinning schedule is
determined by the harvest schedule. The cash flow from the thinning process is:
The real cost of the conservation fund is constant, but the expense will be tax deductible, so the
aftertax cost of the conservation fund will be:
For each analysis, the revenue and costs are:
Excavator piling, broadcast burning, site preparation, and planting costs are the cost of each per acre
times the number of acres. These costs are the same no matter what the harvest schedule since they
are based on acres, not MBF.