Lecture Note: Various investments have been developed to shift the risk of non-
payment of receivables in international transactions from the seller to a
financial institution. For example, the banker’s acceptance is an
irrevocable letter of credit issued by a bank guaranteeing payment of the
face amount. A letter of credit is simply a promise from the buyer’s bank to
make payment upon receipt of the goods by the buyer. Point out that, while
these guarantee arrangements add to the cost of doing business, their
existence greatly facilitates international trade.
3. Analyzing Credit Policy
A. Credit Policy Effects
Revenue effects – price and quantity sold may be increased
Cost effects – the cost of running a credit plan and collecting receivables
Cost of debt – firm must finance receivables
Probability of nonpayment – always get paid if you sell for cash
Cash discount – affects payment patterns and amounts
Slide 28.8 Credit Policy Effects
B. Evaluating a Proposed Credit Policy
Lecture Tip: It’s useful to point out that the process for determining the NPV of a
credit policy switch is the same as the process for determining the NPV of
a capital asset replacement (or “switch”).
The analysis involves a comparison of the marginal costs with the marginal
benefits to be realized from the switch. If a company liberalizes credit
terms, the present value of the marginal profit is
compared to the immediate investment in a higher receivables balance. If a company
tightens credit, lower sales should be expected. The present value of the
reduction in profit is compared to the cash realized from the lower amount
invested in receivables.
Slide 28.9 Example: Evaluating a Proposed Policy – Part I
Slide 28.10 Example: Evaluating a Proposed Policy – Part II
Define:
P = price per unit
v = variable cost per unit
Q = current quantity sold per period
Q = new quantity expected to be sold
R = periodic required return (corresponds to the ACP)
Benefit of switching is the change in cash flow