Since ESOs are essentially like a call option, they can be valued
using the Black-Scholes Model, or other option pricing models.
However, due to the intricacies of some contracts, the value
provided by the models may only be good estimates of true value.
For example, due to the inalienability, the options are worth less to
the executive than they cost the company. The executive can only
exercise, not sell his options. Thus he can never capture the time
(speculative) value—only the intrinsic value. This “dead weight
loss” is overcome by the incentive compatibility for the grantor.
23.2. Valuing a Start-Up
Slide 23.5 Valuing a Start-Up
When estimating the value of a start-up firm, the option to expand
is of great importance in determining the underlying value of the
venture. To illustrate this point, we provide an additional example
in the following slides.
Slide 23.6 Campusteria Pro Forma Income Statement
Slide 23.7 Valuing a Start-Up
Slide 23.8 –
Slide 23.11 Valuing a Start-Up with Black-Scholes
23.3. More on the Binomial Model
Slide 23.12 More on the Binomial Model
The binomial model is an alternative to Black-Scholes, and it may,
particularly in cases of path dependence, be a better approach.
Slide 23.13 Three Period Binomial Option Pricing Example
Slide 23.14 –
Slide 23.15 Three Period Binomial Process
Further, although we still consider only two possible movements
(up or down), we extend the model to illustrate multiple periods,
which essentially creates a tree with many branches.
Slide 23.16 Valuation of a Lookback Option