Other possible goals that students might suggest include minimizing costs
or maximizing market share. Both have potential problems. We can
minimize costs by not purchasing new equipment today, but that may
damage the long-run viability of the firm. Many dot.com companies got
into trouble in the late 1990’s because their goal was to maximize market
share. They raised substantial amounts of capital in IPO’s and then used
the money on advertising to increase the number of “hits” on their site.
However, many firms failed to translate those “hits” into enough revenue
to meet expenses, and they quickly ran out of capital. The stockholders of
these firms were not happy. Stock prices fell dramatically, and it became
difficult for these firms to raise funds. In fact, many of these companies
have gone out of business.
B. The Goal of Financial Management
From a stockholder (owner) perspective, the goal of buying the stock is to
gain financially. Thus, the goal of financial management in a corporation
is to maximize the current value per share of the existing stock.
Lecture Tip: The late Roberto Goizueta, former chairman and CEO of
the Coca-Cola Company, wrote an essay entitled “Why Share-Owner
Value?,” that appeared in the firm’s 1996 annual report. It is an excellent
introduction to the goal of financial management at any level. It may also
be useful to discuss how Mr. Goizueta’s vision transferred to the stock
market’s valuation of the company.
A subsequent article also illustrates the difference in strategy between
Coca-Cola and Pepsi-Co during Mr. Goizueta’s tenure: “How Coke is
Kicking Pepsi’s Can,” Fortune, October 28, 1996.
Coke focused on soft drinks while Pepsi-Co diversified into other areas.
Pepsi-Co’s goal was to double revenues every 5 years, while Mr. Goizueta
focused on return on investment and stock price. The article states that
Goizueta “has created more wealth for stockholders than any other CEO
in history.” In mid-1996, Pepsi-Co sold at 23 times earnings with return
on equity of about 23% and Coke sold at 36 times earnings with a return
on equity of around 55%. The article goes on to discuss the differing
strategies in more detail. It provides a nice validation of Mr. Goizueta’s
remarks in his letter to the shareholders.