Chapter 02 – The Resolution of Private Disputes
2-10
© 2016 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
arbitration clauses are enforceable even if they bar class-wide aggregation of claims.
What do your students think about the Court’s reasoning? What do they think will happen
as a result of this decision? (Almost certainly, companies will respond to the decision by
adding prohibitions on classwide aggregation of claims to the arbitration clauses they put
6. For additional examples of arbitration and FAA issues, see Problems #2 and #5.
IV. RECOMMENDED REFERENCES:
A. G. HAZARD & M. TARUFFO, AMERICAN CIVIL PROCEDURE: AN INTRODUCTION.
B. M. KANE, CIVIL PROCEDURE IN A NUTSHELL.
C. J. NOLAN-HALEY, ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN A NUTSHELL.
V. ANSWERS TO PROBLEM CASES:
2. No. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) overrides a state
law would still apply, however, and would be among the rules to be applied by the arbitrator in
3. No. The Illinois Court of Appeals held that the Oklahoma defendants were subject to the in
personam jurisdiction of the Illinois court. The case, which centered around false statements
situation, the statutory and constitutional issues merge into a single due process inquiry in
which the “minimum contacts” issue becomes critical. The court concluded that the requisite
minimum contacts were present). Moreover, the defendants had also targeted Illinois (and the
Illinois plaintiffs) with phone calls and other communications. Finally, the court concluded
2005).
4. The Ruizes were entitled to the requested documents and materials. The Supreme Court of
it was discoverable. The court rejected the “work product” argument made by the
5. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the district court did not err in
overruling the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to produce certain requested