52 Managerial Accounting for Managers, 4th Edition
Case 8-31 (45 minutes)
1. Rachel Arnett’s revision of her first proposal can be considered a
violation of the IMA’s Statement of Ethical Professional Practice. She
relevant information that could reasonably be expected to influence an
intended user’s understanding of the reports, analyses, or
Competence standard—“Provide decision support information and
recommendations that are accurate, clear, concise, and timely.”
2. Earle was clearly in violation of the Standards of Ethical Conduct for
Management Accountants because he tried to persuade a subordinate to
communicate with business associates to avoid apparent conflicts of
interest.), and Credibility (Communicate information fairly and
analyses, or recommendations.).