Chapter 08 – Foreign Direct Investment
Since World War II, the U.S. has been the largest source country for FDI. The United
Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, Germany, and Japan are other important source
countries.
Slides 8-12 and 8-13 The Form of FDI: Acquisitions Versus Greenfield Investments
Most cross-border investment is in the form of mergers and acquisitions rather than
greenfield investments.
Slides 8-14 and 8-15 Why Choose Foreign Direct Investment?
Why do firms choose FDI instead of exporting or licensing? Internalization theory
(also known as market imperfections theory) suggests that licensing has three major
drawbacks.
Slide 8-16 Think Like a Manager: Exporting, Licensing, or FDI?
Slides 8-17 and 8-18 The Pattern of Foreign Direct Investment
Knickerbocker looked at the relationship between FDI and rivalry in oligopolistic
industries (industries composed of a limited number of large firms) and suggested that
FDI flows are a reflection of strategic rivalry between firms in the global marketplace.
According to the eclectic paradigm, in addition to the various factors discussed earlier, it
is important to consider:
location-specific advantages – that arise from using resource endowments or
assets that are tied to a particular location and that a firm finds valuable to
combine with its own unique assets and
externalities – knowledge spillovers that occur when companies in the same
industry locate in the same area
Slides 8-19 and 8-20 Political Ideology and Foreign Direct Investment
Ideology toward FDI ranges from a radical stance that is hostile to all FDI to the
non-interventionist principle of free market economies. Between these two extremes is
an approach that might be called pragmatic nationalism.
The radical view argues that the MNE is an instrument of imperialist domination and a
tool for exploiting host countries to the exclusive benefit of their capitalist-imperialist
home countries.
According to the free market view, international production should be distributed among
countries according to the theory of comparative advantage.
Pragmatic nationalism suggests that FDI has both benefits, such as inflows of capital,
technology, skills and jobs, and costs, such as repatriation of profits to the home country
and a negative balance of payments effect.
Recently, there has been a strong shift toward the free market stance creating:
a surge in FDI worldwide
an increase in the volume of FDI in countries with newly liberalized regimes
Slides 8-21 and 8-22 Host Country Benefits of FDI
Government policy is often shaped by a consideration of the costs and benefits of FDI.
There are four main benefits of inward FDI for host countries: resource transfer effects;
employment effects; balance of payments effects, and effects on competition and growth.
Slides 8-23 and 8-24 Host Country Costs
There are three mains costs from inward FDI for the host country: the possible adverse
effects of FDI on competition within the host nation; adverse effects on the balance of
payments; and the perceived loss of national sovereignty and autonomy.
Slide 8-25 Home Country Benefits
8-4
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.