costs approximately $500 million to construct and requires a highly skilled work force. The total
value of the world market over the next 10 years for this product is estimated to be between $10
billion and $15 billion. The tariffs prevailing in this industry are currently low. Should the firm
favor concentrated manufacturing or decentralized manufacturing? What kind of location(s)
should the firm favor for its plant(s)?
ANSWER 1: The firm should pursue a concentrated manufacturing strategy because (1) the
tariffs prevailing in the industry are low, (2) the cost of building a plant to produce the
QUESTION 2: A chemical firm is considering how best to supply the world market for sulfuric
acid. A manufacturing plant costs approximately $20 million to construct and requires a
moderately skilled workforce. The total value of the world market for this product over the next
10 years is estimated to be between $20 billion and $30 billion. The tariffs prevailing in this
industry are moderate. Should the firm favor concentrated manufacturing or decentralized
manufacturing? What kind of location(s) should the firm seek for its plant(s)?
ANSWER 2: This question is a tougher call than the scenario depicted in Question 1. The firm
should probably pursue a limited decentralized manufacturing strategy (meaning that the firm
QUESTION 3: A firm must decide whether to make a component part in-house, or to contract it
out to an independent supplier. Manufacturing the part requires a nonrecoverable investment in
specialized assets. The most efficient suppliers are located in countries with currencies that many
foreign exchange analysts expect to appreciate substantially over the next decade. What are the
pros and cons of (a) manufacturing the component in-house, and (b) outsourcing manufacture to
an independent supplier? Which option would you recommend? Why?