OPENING CASE: The IMF and Ukraine’s Economic Crisis
The opening case explores the economic impact of political unrest in Ukraine and the IMF’s role
in restoring stability. In 2013, Ukraine president Viktor Yanukovych pulled the country out of a
trade deal with the European Union in order to strengthen political ties to Russia. Pro-Western
forces in Ukraine protested the decision and removed Yanukovych from office. Russia annexed
the Crimea region of Ukraine in early 2014, sparking civil war that led to economic collapse. The
IMF extended two loans to Ukraine in 2014 and 2015 on the condition that the country used the
funds to support the value of the hryvina, maintained a floating exchange rate, ended oil and gas
subsidies, and instituted a tight monetary policy. The loans, along with additional support from
the United States and European Union, were expected to promote economic growth in Ukraine
by 2016. Discussion of the case can revolve around the following questions.
QUESTION 1: Why was it important for the IMF to step in to help Ukraine? What were the
potential implications of Ukraine’s economic crisis for other countries?
QUESTION 2: How did the IMF help Ukraine? What impact did it have the country’s economy
and prospects for future growth?
QUESTION 3: Discuss the IMF’s approach to shoring up Ukraine’s economy via austerity
measures. What are the expected effects of such measures? Are they likely to lead to economic
growth?
7}.
CRITICAL THINKING AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
QUESTION 1: Why did the gold standard collapse? Is there a case for returning to some type of
gold standard? What is it?