1. increase the performance of evaluation of the low-score product.
2. decrease the performance value of the high-score product.
3. increasing the importance weight of a characteristic on which the low-score product has superior
performance.
4. decreasing the importance weight of a characteristic on which the high-score product has superior
performance.
c. Ask students which of these approaches is the easiest to accomplish? And why?
Ask your students if any of them use this model to make their decision to buy something
important like a car. Many times they will say that they don’t. Yet, if you ask them why they
bought what they bought, they can rattle off a few features that they preferred over another brand
or model. Push a little more and they realize that there were other considerations (attributes) that
they used.
Then point out that buying centers make decisions in organizations, and many times the multi-attribute
model is formalized. For example, many organizations use a list of criteria to evaluate suppliers. They
don’t use these as yes/no questions; rather, they use these to arrive at a score. Similarly, Rockwell
International scores vendors on things such as on-time delivery, accurate delivery, and the like. They then
make decisions about which vendors to retain based on these scores, and they gather similar data from
potential vendors when assessing whether to do business with them. This discussion can lead directly into
the next point
2. This discussion leads nicely into a discussion of the different types of buying decisions. Now have students
describe a buying decision they made that was a straight rebuy such as buying a loaf of bread, a new task
(renting an apartment or buying a car for the first time), and a modified rebuy (finding a new apartment
when their lease expires, buying a new brand of soda on sale, etc.). Have students describe a situation
when they switched from a straight rebuy to a modified rebuy. Ask them why they switched? Also ask
what a salesperson can do to get a customer to switch?
Ask students to provide an example of when they engaged in a new task. Did they evaluate several
alternatives? Why did they evaluate several alternatives? Ask students for examples of financial, physical,
and social risks.
4. This is now a good time to analyze the decision-making process by breaking it down into a series of logical
steps. Relate these steps in the buying process to the process that students go through when buying a loaf
of bread, renting an apartment, and buying a car. Ask students to describe how the buying process differs
for a new task, a modified rebuy, and a straight rebuy. Which steps are the most important for a salesperson
to be involved for each type of buying decision?
5. Describe the functions and relative importance of the user, the influencer, the gatekeeper, and the decider,
especially as they relate to the various steps in the buying process. The controller determines the budget.
Users can be initiators, but also passive influencers.
One way to incorporate the Miller-Heiman perspective is to ask students to compare and contrast that view
with the buying center – are these competing views of the buying unit or complementary?
6. Start to wrap-up by discussing the trends in organizational buying. For each of these trends, ask students
what the effect will be on salespeople. Ask them what will salespeople have to do to deal effectively with
these changes? How will the changes affect the relationship between the salesperson and his or her
customers and their companies? Some of the trends include technology and the economy, but ask them to
think about what it will be like to sell to their parents’ peers. Trends that reflect generational differences are
important because our students do sell to their parents’ peers!
7. Conclude this session with a comparison of the selling and buying processes. Show how the subsequent
chapters on the selling process match the steps in the buying and adoption process outlined in this chapter.
Suggested Answers to Ethics Problems