Chapter 8 – Segment and Interim Reporting – Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, 13e
8-4
Education.
statements: revenues from external customers, intersegment revenues, segment profit or
loss, and, if there has been a material change since the annual report, total assets.
IX. IAS 34, “Interim Financial Reporting,” provides guidance in IFRS with respect to interim
financial statements.
A. Unlike U.S. GAAP, IAS 34 requires each interim period to be treated as a discrete
accounting period in terms of the amounts to be recognized. As a result, expenses
that are incurred in one quarter are expensed in that quarter even though the
expenditure benefits the entire year. And there is no accrual in earlier quarters for
expenses expected to be incurred later in the year.
Answer to Discussion Question: How Does a Company Determine Whether a
Foreign Country is Material?
In his well-publicized “The Numbers Game” speech delivered in September 1998, former SEC
chairman Arthur Levitt cited “materiality” as one of five gimmicks used by companies to manage
earnings. Although his remarks were not specifically directed toward the issue of geographic
segment reporting, the intent was to warn corporate America that materiality should not be used
as an excuse for inappropriate accounting.
To make the point even more salient, ASC 250-10-S99 (SAB Topic 1.M, Assessing Materiality,
originally issued by the SEC as Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 99, “Materiality”), warns financial
statement preparers that reliance on a simple numerical rule of thumb, such as 5% of net
income, is not sufficient. And in paragraph QC 11 of Statement of Financial Accounting
Concepts (SFAC) 8, the FASB stated the essence of the materiality aspect of relevance as
follows:
“Information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users
make on the basis of the financial information of a specific reporting entity….Consequently,
the Board cannot specify a uniform quantitative threshold for materiality or predetermine
what could be material in a particular situation.”
Further, ASC 250-10-S99 reminds companies that both quantitative and qualitative factors
should be considered in determining materiality. With respect to segment reporting, ASC 250-
10-S99 states:
“The materiality of a misstatement may turn on where it appears in the financial statements.
For example, a misstatement may involve a segment of the registrant’s operations. In that
instance, in assessing materiality of a misstatement to the financial statements taken as a
whole, registrants and their auditors should consider not only the size of the misstatement
but also the significance of the segment information to the financial statements taken as a
whole. “A misstatement of the revenue and operating profit of a relatively small segment
that is represented by management to be important to the future profitability of the entity” is
more likely to be material to investors than a misstatement in a segment that management
has not identified as especially important. In assessing the materiality of misstatements in
segment information – as with materiality generally – situations may arise in practice where
the auditor will conclude that a matter relating to segment information is qualitatively
material even though, in his or her judgment, it is quantitatively immaterial to the financial
statements taken as a whole.
Thus, in addition to quantitative factors, such as the relative percentage of total revenues