International Business
Geringer, McNett, Minor, Ball
Instructor Guide to Module 6
13 Instructor’s Manual – Module 6 | Geringer, McNett, Minor, Ball © 2016 by McGraw-Hill Education.
GLOBAL DEBATE: A Threat to National Sovereignty? U.S. Dolphin-Safe Tuna Labeling
vs. the WTO
The WTO has ruled that U.S. dolphin–safe tuna labeling violates WTO trade rules. The reasoning
is that this voluntary labeling, which communicates to the public that the tuna is not caught
using a fishing technique called purse seining, a netting approach that kills many dolphin while
netting the lower-swimming tuna, is a technical barrier to trade. Given the labeling, the U.S.
public prefers dolphin-safe tuna. The label was created by an Act of Congress to safeguard
dolphin, and, again, is voluntary. The plaintiffs in the case, Mexican tuna fishing companies, are
free to export their catch to the U.S. The response to the WTO ruling is one of concern, because
government regulations and practices related to political and social ends are often implemented
through trade-related measures. This goes to the argument that the WTO and other
international organizations infringe on national sovereignty.
Online and Hybrid: Virtual teams can be assigned these questions for submission and
evaluation.
Face-to–Face: In a team or individually, students can be asked to develop responses to
the questions and then discuss them.
1. Do you think the WTO should be able to prohibit labeling that provides information of
potential value to consumers? Why or why not?
2. Should the WTO ensure that the science behind local laws and regulations is sound
and not a cover for protectionism? If so, how could it do so?
3. Some people have argued that member nations give up national sovereignty rights by
joining the WTO and allowing it to make decisions that are not in the best interest of a
particular nation, especially since many WTO meetings are not open to the public. Do you
agree with this interpretation and, if so, what could be done to address the situation?