International Business
Geringer, McNett, Minor, Ball
Instructor Guide to Module 2
Instructor’s Manual – Module 2 | Geringer, McNett, Minor, Ball © 2016 by McGraw-Hill Education.
This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner. This
document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Online and Hybrid: Virtual teams can be assigned to take different perspectives to argue
for or against international trade and foreign direct investment and these assignments can be
submitted as a group and then opened up to discussion and debate on an online class discussion
site or blog, or presented and debated in a face-to-face setting.
Face-to–Face: Students can be assigned to take different perspectives to argue for or
against international trade and foreign direct investment and then they can be asked to argue
their positions within an in–class debate and discussion.
3. Current events for sources of culture controversy
A focus on current events that are relevant to the module’s topics is a good way to bring home
the concepts, review their application and build news-review habits.Five minutes at the
beginning of class is devoted to discussion of current events.Recent relevant current events
1. Students often are unaware of the rapid growth of international trade, so we discuss
Figure 2.1 in class. We point out that there have been numerous changes in trade relationships
as Table 2.1 illustrates. Most students believe that the major trade direction is between
developed and developing nations (exchanging raw materials for finished goods). Figure 2.2
shows the major trading partners of the United States, which shows that there are several
Asian trading partners in addition to the traditional European and NAFTA trade partners among
the key export markets for U.S. goods, as well as for imports into the U.S.
2. The material on Theories of International Trade is somewhat difficult for many students
and it is easy to lose their interest when discussing theories from the 17th century. We
emphasize in class that there are good, practical reasons for knowing the essentials as we have
also emphasized in the text. We recommend that you go slowly in discussing comparative
advantage. If you whip through it, you will probably lose most of the class. We commonly ask a
student to come to the board and create a table to explain the theory and we give him or her
all of the help required. We came across a short haiku-like summary of comparative advantage
that might help students get the general idea: Do what you do best and trade the rest.