Chapter 13 – Financial Industry Structure
5. State banks devised another way to raise funds, which was the creation of
demand deposits.
6. The dual banking system still persists today, in which banks can choose
whether to get a charter from the federal government or from state officials.
7. State charters account for about two-thirds of U.S. banks, because the greater
permissiveness of state authorities (in terms of the types of operations they
allow) has meant a better chance of making a profit.
8. Banks can switch back and forth between federal and state charters, creating
what amounts to regulatory competition.
9. In 1933, Congress passed the Glass-Steagall Act, which created the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and severely limited the activities of
commercial banks, separating banks from the securities industry in order to
avoid conflicts of interest.
10. This restriction on commercial bank activities remained in place until 1999,
when the passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services
Modernization Act repealed Glass-Steagall, and opened up the possibilities for
banks to take advantage of economies of scale and scope.
11. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
sets new rules for financial institutions and markets, requires closer
government oversight of systematically important financial institutions, and
altered the authorities of the government agencies that govern the financial
system.
B. Competition and Consolidation
1. The U.S. banking structure is composed of a large number of very small banks
and a small number of very large ones.
2. The primary reason for this structure is the McFadden Act of 1927, which
required that nationally chartered banks meet the branching restrictions of the
states in which they were located. Since some states had laws that forbade
branching, the result was a large number of very small banks.
3. Some banks reacted to branching restrictions by creating bank holding
companies, corporations that own a group of other firms (like a parent firm for
a group of subsidiaries).
4. In 1956, Congress passed the Bank Holding Company Act, which broadened
the scope of what bank holding companies could do, allowing them to provide
various nonbank financial services.
5. Beginning in the 1970s, technology reduced the importance of physical
location in banking and eroded the value of the local banking monopoly.
Today, the majority of small businesses use various forms of internet banking,
making the physical location of the bank even less important.
6. In 1994 Congress passed the Reigle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching
Efficiency Act, which reversed the restrictions put in place by the McFadden
13-6
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.