Extra Example: J&J’s Decentralized Structure
Johnson & Johnson today operates in 57 countries with 250 operating companies. How does one manage a company
with so many different products and operations in so many different countries? Obviously, trying to concentrate all
decision-making authority at the New Brunswick, N.J., corporate office would create a huge bottleneck. So what is
J&J’s solution? Decentralization. But at J&J, decentralization has been carried to an extent that most other
companies would find impossible to replicate. Because of its extreme decentralization, the managing directors of
operating companies have enormous freedom to run their businesses.
But where do you find that many entrepreneurial managers to run its highly decentralized businesses? This is where
management development plays a crucial part. Managers in their early years are rotated through different business
segments systematically so that they become broadly developed. For example, Sheri McCoy, the incoming head of
pharma, started in consumer R&D, and then served in the devices and diagnostics group before being promoted to
the head of pharma.
Decentralization of such a scale can potentially have two negative consequences. First, the corporate office can lose
control. Second, efficiencies and scale advantages may be lost. How does J&J avoid these undesirable outcomes?
They standardize processes in staff and support areas like procurement, human resources, and IT, but not in
operations. The standardization of processes ensures control and cost reduction while decentralization facilitates
operational freedom.
Source: Colvin, G., & Shambora, J. 2009. J&J: Secrets of success. Fortune. May 4: 117–121.
Discussion Question 23: What are some of the control challenges J&J would face as
they expand into more countries?
F. Global or Regional? A Second Look at Globalization
Full-scale globalization may not be the best strategic move for many types of firms.
Recent research indicates that most companies are regional or, at best, bi-regional rather than
global. Considering the advances in communication why is this so? Several reasons are
The SUPPLEMENT below extends the discussion of the importance of regional growth
in the overall globalization trend.
Extra Example: Growth in Regional Trade Fuels Global Expansion
In his Harvard Business Review article “Regional strategies for global leadership,” Pankaj Ghemawat explains that
regional strategies are not just a halfway measure between local strategies and global strategies but represent a
unique set of strategies that leverage economic, cultural and administrative similarities to boost company
performance. This is evidenced in part by the extent to which regional initiatives dominant cross-country activity
during the second half of the 20th century. For example, increases in intraregional trade have outpaced global trade in
Oceania and Asia for over forty years. In 1958, 35 percent of the trade in Asia and Oceania occurred between
countries in that geographic region. By 2000, within-region trade exceeded 50 percent of the trade in the Asia–