Before proceeding, firms must first define the scope of the innovation efforts, and must ensure
that their innovation efforts are not wasted on projects that are outside the firm’s domain of
interest. In defining the innovation scope, a firm should answer several questions:
●How much will the innovation cost?
●How likely is it to actually become commercially viable?
●How much value will it add; that is, what will it be worth if it works?
●What will be learned if it does not pan out?
As a counter example of innovation, Mini Melts had adopted a strategy of global expansion.
Mini Melts expanded by selling dealerships for vending machines and kiosks, rather than
While the strategy adopted by Dippin’ Dots was to introduce new products, it appeared as if the
Dots’n Cream and Dot Delicacies both may have required additional, possibly costly,
manufacturing equipment. Certainly the frozen coffee dots would. Perhaps the Dots’n Cream and
coffee dots products required distribution connections and marketing expertise the company did
What challenges exist for the new ownership? Will any market testing be sufficient enough to
determine whether the new products are worth pursuing? Does new management have the
operational skill to lead this effort? Has new President Scott Fischer thought out the implications
NOTE – ADDITIONAL READING:
Read this 2003 article about two Dippin’ Dots imitators:
http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2003/10/07/biz_wwwbiz2dot.html
Here is information about one of those competitors, who has done well since:
http://www.minimelts.com
Here is a website where you can download a copy of the patent infringement judgment at
http://www.gehrkelaw.com/2007/02/dippin_dots_inc.html
And here is a shortened version of the court case outcome:
http://www.nixonpeabody.com/publications_detail3.asp?ID=1704