In order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage, microfinance institutions need to assess
their ability to contend with other lenders, especially large, publicly held commercial banks. The
question of how to compete in a given business to attain competitive advantage requires an
assessment of the types of competitive strategies, including the three generic strategies that are
used to overcome the five forces and achieve a competitive advantage:
●Overall cost leadership
oLow-cost-position relative to a firm’s peers
●Differentiation
oCreate products and/or services that are unique and valued
●Focus strategy
oNarrow product lines, buyer segments, or targeted geographic markets
From the case, it appears that microfinance institutions, in general, have adopted a focus strategy.
They have selected a segment of the banking industry – loans – and have differentiated this
service to exploit a particular market niche – the very poor. However, as mentioned in the
textbook, there are pitfalls of the focus strategy. For microfinance, one of the main problems has
become erosion of cost advantages within the narrow segment. As illustrated in the case, the
transaction costs of making these loans are very high, necessitating correspondingly higher
interest rates and repayment terms. And as the microfinance industry matures, there may be
another pitfall: too narrow a service offering. Clients may begin to want more than just loans.
What about savings accounts or access to other investment opportunities? As the “very poor”
migrate to become the “poor” have the organizations within the industry consider who else might
emerge to enter this service segment?
Life cycle issues are important to consider when firms must make decisions about the optimal
business-level strategies and the relative emphasis to place on functional capabilities and value-
Managers must strive to emphasize the key functional areas and value-creating activities that can
help an organization sustain its health. It’s important to note that there can be many cycles of
In the microfinance case, an argument might be made that the industry has reached maturity, and
must focus on refining the process of making loans that are profitable for all parties. This
A key challenge in the case is whether or not microfinance institutions should pursue public
financing. Going public is necessary for three reasons:
1. The bank needs outside capital resources to grow and continue to develop its loan
process. With pressures to reduce interest rates, the margins on the loans are shrinking.