NOTE – ADDITIONAL READING, WEB LINKS:
Krill hinted at a new upscale strategy in 2007, with a further beauty business and
maternity line proposed for 2008:
See http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/09/17/ann-taylor-goes-for-gold.aspx
and
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/08/13/quick-take-more-change-at-ann-
taylor.aspx
None of this actually materialized except the maternity line at LOFT. Was that because of
the economic downturn, or was Krill being unrealistic about ANN’s ability to tackle new
initiatives?
ANN has also had considerable turnover in management ranks in recent years. See this
report from 2012 about the “revolving door” in the executive suite at ANN, specifically
the leadership of AT vs LOFT. As this report says, “Over the years, Ms. Krill has become
disenchanted with the leaders of both brands, often taking over herself to right foundering
ships… She’d basically go back and forth between whichever concept was struggling, and
then the other one would end up struggling”:
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20120415/SUB/304159981
Here is a profile of Kay Krill over the years: for instance, “In 2008, she launched a multi-
year turnaround that includes store closings, scaled-back headquarters staff and other
cost-saving programs.”
http://www.wwd.com/people-companies/people-profile/kay-krill-1591217
What does this say about ANN’s intangible resources and their capability to execute
strategy going forward? Will the move to Ascena create the needed synergies for future
profitability? There’s no word as of the publication of this note as to Krill’s fate –
whether she will remain at ANN or not.
Teaching Note References (and possible additional assigned readings)
Porter, M.E. 1996. “What is strategy?”, Harvard Business Review, 74(6): 61-78.
Porter, M.E. 2007. “Michael Porter’s Big Ideas”, Fast Company, 44, (December 19),
available at http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/44/porter.html
Porter, M.E. 2008. “The five competitive forces that shape strategy”, Harvard Business
Review,86(1): 78-93.