upscale professional women, but that continued to face increasing competition and a challenging
economic environment. ANN had experienced significant growth in the past, but was now
ANN was not the only retailer suffering in a poor economic climate. News
reported at the beginning of the case conrms that the entire retail industry
was still facing an unpredictable environment in the aftermath of the
To generate growth, Krill had identified several distinct areas of opportunity. She continued her
ongoing efforts to revitalize the flagship Ann Taylor (AT) store brand, while not dampening
It was clear that Krill was firmly committed to long-term growth. However, although profitable
in 2014, ANN was just beginning to return to the sales profile of 2007. The basic question of the
case is whether Krill was doing what she should do to regain and retain profitability. Was she
Teaching Plan
The Ann Taylor case is a candidate for a “comprehensive” case that can be used to illustrate
many facets of strategic management. Ann Taylor Stores Corporation (ANN) was a large
specialty retailer facing an extremely competitive environment. Economic conditions had further
complicated competition from rivals. ANN faced a variety of challenges, offering the reader
several strategic options to consider. The addition of the industry and current competitors’
information makes the case a good one to use for strategic analysis and formulation. Information
on ANN’s multiple divisions and operational overview makes it a good candidate for a
discussion of internal resources and capabilities, and the strong presence of CEO Kay Krill leads
to a discussion of strategic leadership and implementation.
For those instructors who like to include a discussion of marketing concerns as part of an overall
business policy course, the branding challenges outlined in Ann Taylor make it possible to use
the case to augment a discussion of marketing strategy.