978-1259277160 Chapter 5 Solution Manual Part 3

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 9
subject Words 1822
subject Authors Bartley Danielsen, Geoffrey Hirt, Stanley Block

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
5-17. Solution:
Cain Supplies
Cain
EBIT $50,000
Less: Interest 9,000
18. Leverage and stockholder wealth (LO4) Sterling Optical and Royal Optical both make
glass frames and each is able to generate earnings before interest and taxes of $132,000.
The separate capital structures for Sterling and Royal are shown here:
Sterling Royal
Debt @ 12%……………… $ 660,000 Debt @ 12%…………… $ 220,000
Common stock, $5 par…… 440,000 Common stock, $5 par 880,000
Total……………………… $1,100,000 Total…………………… $1,100,000
Common shares………….. 88,000 Common shares………... 176,000
a. Compute earnings per share for both firms. Assume a 25 percent tax rate.
b. In part a, you should have gotten the same answer for both companies’ earnings per
share. Assuming a P/E ratio of 22 for each company, what would its stock price be?
c. Now as part of your analysis, assume the P/E ratio would be 16 for the riskier
company in terms of heavy debt utilization in the capital structure and 24 for the less
risky company. What would the stock prices for the two firms be under these
assumptions? (Note: Although interest rates also would likely be different based on
risk, we will hold them constant for ease of analysis.)
d. Based on the evidence in part c, should management be concerned only about the
impact of financing plans on earnings per share, or should stockholders’ wealth
maximization (stock price) be considered as well?
5-18. Solution:
Sterling Optical and Royal Optical
a.
Sterling Royal
EBIT $132,000 $132,000
Less: Interest 79,200 26,400
page-pf2
b. Stock price = P/E ×EPS
c. Sterling Royal
d. Clearly, the ultimate objective should be to maximize the stock price. While
19. Japanese firm and combined leverage (LO5) Firms in Japan often employ both high
operating and financial leverage because of the use of modern technology and close
borrower–lender relationships. Assume the Mitaka Company has a sales volume of 130,000
units at a price of $30 per unit; variable costs are $10 per unit and fixed costs are
$1,850,000. Interest expense is $405,000. What is the degree of combined leverage for this
Japanese firm?
5-19. Solution:
Mitaka Company
( VC)
DCL ( VC) FC
130,000 ($30 $10)
130,000 ($30 $10) $1,850,000 $405,000
130,000 ($20)
130,000 ($20) $2,255,000
$2,600,000 $2,255,000
Q P
Q P I
-
=- - -
-
=- - -
=-
page-pf3
20. Combining operating and financial leverage (LO5) Sinclair Manufacturing and Boswell
Brothers Inc. are both involved in the production of brick for the homebuilding industry.
Their financial information is as follows:
Capital Structure
Sinclair Boswell
Debt @ 11%............................................................ $ 900,000 0
Common stock, $10 per share................................ 600,000 $ 1,5000,000
Total..................................................................... $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Common shares....................................................... 60,000 150,000
Operating Plan
Sales (55,000 units at $20 each).............................. $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000
Less: Variable costs............................................. 880,000 550,000
.................................................................................. ($16 per unit) ($10 per unit)
Fixed costs....... 0 305,000
Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT)............... $ 220,000 $ 245,000
a. If you combine Sinclair’s capital structure with Boswell’s operating plan, what is the
degree of combined leverage? (Round to two places to the right of the decimal point.)
b. If you combine Boswell’s capital structure with Sinclair’s operating plan, what is the
degree of combined leverage?
c. Explain why you got the results you did in part b.
d. In part b, if sales double, by what percentage will EPS increase?
5-20. Solution:
Sinclair Manufacturing and Boswell Brothers
a.
( VC)
DCL ( VC) FC
55,000 ($20 $10)
55,000 ($20 $10) $305,000 $99,000
550,000
550,000 $305,000 $99,000
3.77x
Q P
Q P I
-
=- - -
-
=- - -
=- -
=
page-pf4
b.
( VC)
DCL ( VC) FC
55,000($20 $16)
55,000($20 $16) 0 0
55,000($4)
55,000($4)
$220,000
$220,000
1x
Q P
Q P I
-
=- - -
-
=- - -
=
=
=
5-20. (Continued)
21. Expansion and leverage (LO5) DeSoto Tools Inc. is planning to expand production. The
expansion will cost $300,000, which can be financed either by bonds at an interest rate of
14 percent or by selling 10,000 shares of common stock at $30 per share. The current
income statement before expansion is as follows:
DESOTO TOOLS Inc.
Income Statement
page-pf5
Shares............................................................................. 100,000
Earnings per share.......................................................... $ 2.64
After the expansion, sales are expected to increase by $1,000,000. Variable costs will
remain at 30 percent of sales, and fixed costs will increase to $800,000. The tax rate is
34 percent.
a. Calculate the degree of operating leverage, the degree of financial leverage, and the
degree of combined leverage before expansion. (For the degree of operating leverage,
use the formula developed in footnote 2. For the degree of combined leverage, use the
formula developed in footnote 3. These instructions apply throughout this problem.)
b. Construct the income statement for the two alternative financing plans.
c. Calculate the degree of operating leverage, the degree of financial leverage, and the
degree of combined leverage, after expansion.
d. Explain which financing plan you favor and the risks involved with each plan.
5-21. Solution:
DeSoto Tools Inc.
a.
VC
DOL TVC FC
S
S
-
=- -
page-pf6
TVC
DCL TVC FC
$1,500,000 $450,000
$1,500,000 $450,000 $550,000 $100,000
$1,050,000 2.63x
$400,000
S
S I
-
=- - -
-
=---
= =
5-21. (Continued)
b. Income Statement after Expansion
Debt Equity
Sales $2,500,000 $2,500,000
Less: Variable costs (30%) 750,000 750,000
1 New interest expense level if expansion is financed with debt.
2 Number of common shares outstanding if expansion is financed with equity.
page-pf7
c.
TVC
DOL TVC FC
$2,500,000 $750,000
DOL (Debt/Equity) $2,500,000 $750,000 $800,000
$1,750,000 1.84x
$950,000
S
S
-
=- -
-
=- -
= =
5-21. (Continued)
EBIT
DFL EBIT
$950,000 $950,000
DFL (Debt) 1.18x
$950,000-$142,000 $808,000
$950,000 $950,000
DFL (Equity) 1.12x
$950,000-$100,000 $850,000
$2,500,000 $750,000
DCL (Debt) $2,500,000 $750,000 $800,000 $142,00
I
=-
= = =
= = =
-
=---0
$1,750,000 2.17x
$808,000
= =
$2,500,000 $750,000
DCL (Equity) $2,500,000 $750,000 $800,000 $100,000
-
=- - -
page-pf8
22. Leverage analysis with actual companies (LO6) Using Standard & Poor’s data or annual
reports, compare the financial and operating leverage of Chevron, Eastman Kodak, and
Delta Airlines for the most current year. Explain the relationship between operating and
financial leverage for each company and the resultant combined leverage. What accounts
for the differences in leverage of these companies?
5-22. Solution:
23. Leverage and sensitivity analysis (LO6) Dickinson Company has $12 million in assets.
Currently half of these assets are financed with long-term debt at 10 percent and half with
common stock having a par value of $8. Ms. Smith, vice president of finance, wishes to
analyze two refinancing plans, one with more debt (D) and one with more equity (E). The
company earns a return on assets before interest and taxes of 10 percent. The tax rate is 45
percent.
Under Plan D, a $3 million long-term bond would be sold at an interest rate of
12 percent and 375,000 shares of stock would be purchased in the market at $8 per share
and retired.
Under Plan E, 375,000 shares of stock would be sold at $8 per share and the $3,000,000
in proceeds would be used to reduce long-term debt.
a. How would each of these plans affect earnings per share? Consider the current plan
and the two new plans.
b. Which plan would be most favorable if return on assets fell to 5 percent? Increased to
15 percent? Consider the current plan and the two new plans.
c. If the market price for common stock rose to $12 before the restructuring, which plan
would then be most attractive? Continue to assume that $3 million in debt will be
used to retire stock in Plan D and $3 million of new equity will be sold to retire debt
in Plan E. Also assume for calculations in part c that return on assets is 10 percent.
5-23. Solution:
Dickinson Company
Income Statements
a. Return on assets = 10% EBIT = $ 1,200,000
Current Plan D Plan E
page-pf9
1 $6,000,000 debt @ 10%
Plan E and the original plan provide the same earnings per share because the cost
5-23. (Continued)
b. Return on assets = 5% EBIT = $600,000
Current Plan D Plan E
EBIT $600,000 $600,000 $ 600,000
Return on assets = 15% EBIT = $1,800,000
Current Plan D Plan E
EBIT $1,800,000 $1,800,000 $1,800,000
Less: Interest 600,000 960,000 300,000
If the return on assets decreases to 5 percent, Plan E provides the best EPS, and at
15 percent return, Plan D provides the best EPS. Plan D is still risky, having an
interest coverage ratio of less than 2.0.
5-23. (Continued)
page-pfa
c. Return on Assets = 10% EBIT = $1,200,000
Current Plan D Plan E
1 750,000 – ($3,000,000/$12 per share)
2 750,000 + ($3,000,000/$12 per share)
As the price of the common stock increases, Plan E becomes more attractive
24. Leverage and sensitivity analysis (LO6) Edsel Research Labs has $27 million in assets.
Currently, half of these assets are financed with long-term debt at 5 percent and half with
common stock having a par value of $10. Ms. Edsel, the vice president of finance, wishes
to analyze two refinancing plans, one with more debt (D) and one with more equity (E).
The company earns a return on assets before interest and taxes of 5 percent. The tax rate is
30 percent.
Under Plan D, a $6.75 million long-term bond would be sold at an interest rate of 11
percent and 675,000 shares of stock would be purchased in the market at $10 per share and
retired. Under Plan E, 675,000 shares of stock would be sold at $10 per share and the
$6,750,000 in proceeds would be used to reduce long-term debt.
a. How would each of these plans affect earnings per share? Consider the current plan
and the two new plans. Which plan(s) would produce the highest EPS? Note that due
to tax loss carry-forwards and carry-backs, taxes can be a negative number.
b. Which plan would be most favorable if return on assets increased to 8 percent?
Compare the current plan and the two new plans. What has caused the plans to give
different EPS numbers?
c. Assuming return on assets is back to the original 5 percent, but the interest rate on
new debt in Plan D is 7 percent, which of the three plans will produce the highest
EPS? Why?

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.