208,336.0
= $456,400 vs. $1,415,800 expanded
Standard deviation
5. Coefficient of variation ( ) Expected value
V=
Standard size restaurant Expanded restaurant
Standard deviation
Expected value
141.1
800,240,1$
800,415,1$
6. Based on the coefficient of variation, the standard size restaurant is much less risky (.722 versus
1.141).
Earlier in question two, the preference was clearly for expanded size restaurants. The general
principle is that you may not wish to always go with the highest return. Risk must be considered as
well.
7. Coefficient of variation
4 standard, 1 expanded $ 641,630 / 753,760 = .851
3 standard, 2 expanded 832,460 / 875,420 = .951
2 standard, 3 expanded 1,025,800 / 997,280 = 1.028
1 standard, 4 expanded 1,220,400 / 1,119,040 = 1.091
Based on the answer to question five as well as this question, the lowest-risk alternative is still the
five standard restaurants with a coefficient of variation of .722.
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent
of McGraw-Hill Education.