•
modern world system (MWS)
•
core
•
periphery
•
semiperiphery
•
neoimperialism
•
transnational capitalist class (TCC)
Teaching Tips
• We call this perspective “structuralism” because it is the broadest name we could think of —a
big tent that includes Marx, Lenin, Wallerstein, and many others who have a somewhat
similar understanding of political economy. A common theme amongst these political
economists is recognition that the structure of the economy conditions both its political and
social dimensions. We recognize that this is a problem for some experts and instructors who
would prefer to call this perspective Marxist, Marxist-Leninist, or “Radical.”
• As noted in the text, this chapter leaves out many of the ideas of Marx and Lenin, focusing
only on the notions that are really critical to an understanding of IPE. It is hard for a person
who knows all about the labor theory of value, for example, but it is probably necessary,
given the introductory level of the text. When presenting material about Marx and Lenin (as
with economic liberalism and mercantilism), consider which ideas are most important and
focus on them.
• Pick a policy issue related to globalization and have students study the issue from a
structuralist perspective. What contributions to our understanding of the issue does
structuralism provide that the other three perspectives do not?