International Corporate Governance and Control 6
14. Divestiture Decision. San Gabriel Corp. recently considered divesting its Italian subsidiary and
determined that the divestiture was not feasible. The required rate of return on this subsidiary was 17
percent. In the last week, San Gabriel’s required return on that subsidiary increased to 21 percent. If
the sales price of the subsidiary has not changed, explain why the divestiture may now be feasible.
ANSWER: As a project’s required rate of return increases, the present value of cash flows decreases.
15. Divestiture Decision. Ethridge Co. of Atlanta, Georgia has a subsidiary in India that produces
products and sells them throughout Asia. In response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the
U.S., Ethridge Co. decided to conduct a capital budgeting analysis to determine whether it should
divest the subsidiary. Why might this decision be different after the attack as opposed to before the
attack? Describe the general method for determining whether the divestiture is financially feasible.
ANSWER: The divestiture decision may be different because cash flow estimates may have changed
16. Feasibility of a Divestiture. Merton Inc. has a subsidiary in Bulgaria that it fully finances with its
own equity. Last week, a firm offered to buy the subsidiary from Merton Inc. for $60 million in cash
and the offer is still available this week as well. The annualized long-term risk-free rate in the U.S.
increased from 7% to 8% this week. The expected monthly cash flows to be generated by the
subsidiary have not changed since last week. The risk premium that Merton Inc. applies to its projects
in Bulgaria was reduced from 11.3% to 10.9% this week. The annualized long-term risk-free rate in
Bulgaria declined from 23% to 21% this week. Would the NPV to Merton Inc. from divesting this
unit be more or less than the NPV determined last week? Why? [No analysis is necessary, but make
sure that your explanation is very clear.]
ANSWER: The NPV of the divestiture would be higher because a higher discount rate would be used
as the required rate of return applied to the subsidiary’s cash flows. The risk-free rate increased by 1%
17. Accounting for Government Restrictions. Sunbelt Inc. plans to purchase a firm in Indonesia. It
believes that it can install its operating procedure in this firm, which would significantly reduce the
firm’s operating expenses. However, the Indonesian government may approve the acquisition only if
Sunbelt does not lay off any workers. How can Sunbelt possibly increase efficiency without laying off
workers? How can Sunbelt account for the Indonesian government’s position as it assesses the NPV
of this possible acquisition?
ANSWER: Sunbelt should first consider the profile of the workers who it would lay off if it could
after improving the operations. Then, it could decide how it could revise the job descriptions so that
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.