a.
b.
c.
d.
1.
2.
3.
4.
C2. Interpreting Financial Reports: Internal Control Lapse
The control activities that were likely violated in this case are as follows.
Authorization: These expenditures were probably not authorized by a person who
No set solution. Note to Instructor: This case introduces students to the different types of
Periodic independent verification: There was apparently no independent verification
Separation of duties: It is likely that these expenditures were authorized by the em-
Sound personnel procedures: It is likely that sound personnel policies such as rotation
conceal the fraud.
of jobs, required vacations, and bonding were violated and enabled the employee to
C3. Conceptual Understanding: Internal Controls
C4. Annual Report Case: Internal Control Responsibilities
Management states, “We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
The auditor states, “Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become in-
control over financial reporting is effective and provides reasonable assurance that
2011, based on COSO criteria.”
assets are safeguarded and that the financial records are reliable for preparing finan-
cial statements as of December 31, 2011.”
The auditor states, “In our opinion, CVS Caremark Corporation maintained in all ma-
Management states, “Based on our assessment, we conclude our Company’s internal
terial respects effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
the policies or procedures may deteriorate.”
internal control over financial reporting.”
8-21
© 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.