CHAPTER 6 Limited Liability Companies 43
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
51. Articles of termination must be filed with
the secretary of state or other appropriate
state authority to terminate the existence of
the limited liability company.
52. Under certain circumstances, such as when
members have used the company to de-
fraud creditors, the limited liability compa-
ny veil may be pierced and the members
may be held personally liable.
Transacting Business as a Foreign Limited
Liability Company
53. A limited liability company is considered a
foreign company in every state, other than
its state of organization, in which it trans-
acts business.
54. A limited liability company must file an
application for a certificate of authority to
transact business as a foreign limited liabil-
ity company with the secretary of state or
other appropriate state authority of the for-
eign state.
The Paralegal’s Role
55. Paralegals can perform a wide variety of
functions to assist with the formation,
maintenance, and dissolution of limited lia-
bility companies.
Resources
56. Paralegals are often asked to research lim-
ited liability law. That research may in-
clude state statutes, the Internal Revenue
Code and Revenue Rulings, case law, and
securities acts.
CASE BRIEFS
Addy, et al. v. Myers, 616 NW2d 359 (ND
2000)
Purpose: This case illustrates the general rule of
limited liability for the members of a limited
liability company, and it shows how members
can be held personally liable for the company’s
obligations by providing personal guarantees.
Cause of Action: Breach of contract
Facts: This case is a dispute between certain
members of a limited liability company called
M.A.H.D. Group, L.L.C. (the “LLC”). The LLC
was formed in 1995 to establish a restaurant in
Bismarck, North Dakota, by the name of Ed Foo
Yungs. The LLC was owned by four families:
Guy and Nancy Myers, Boyd and Deb Addy,
Tom and Kathy Hutchens, and Lance and Lori
Doerr. Each family contributed $42,500 and
owned 25 percent of the company.
Twice, shortly after the restaurant
opened, the owners of the LLC agreed that addi-
tional funds were needed. A total of $45,000
was borrowed from BNC National Bank. Boyd
Addy and Tom Hutchens, the plaintiffs in this
case, personally signed for the funds, which they
loaned to the LLC. The LLC was to repay BNC
National Bank with proceeds from the business.
In February 1997, the owners of the
LLC held a meeting and decided to close the
business. The minutes of a March 1997 meeting,
at which Boyd Addy, Tom Hutchens, Nancy
and Guy Myers, and Lance and Lori Doerr were
present, state that it was agreed that the $45,000
owed to BNC National Bank would be assumed
equally by the Addys, the Myers, and the
Hutchens. Nancy and Guy Myers subsequently
retained an attorney to write a letter requesting
the minutes of the March meeting be revised to
reflect that the Myers had not agreed to assume
any personal liability for the $15,000 (their
share of the $45,000 owed to the bank).
Boyd Addy and Tom Hutchens sued
Guy and Nancy Myers in district court. The trial
court granted summary judgment for Guy My-
ers, because he was not a capital contributor,
owner, manager, governor, or an officer of the
LLC. After a bench trial, the court decided that
Nancy Myers had not guaranteed repayment of
the $15,000 loan, because there was no written
guaranty signed by her, and that she was not
personally liable for debts and obligations of the
LLC due to her status as a member of a limited
liability company.