978-1133019145 Chapter 11 Solution Manual

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 9
subject Words 5142
subject Authors Angela Schneeman

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
76
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
CHAPTER 11
Public Corporations and Securities Regulations
THEME
Chapter 11 is an introduction to public corpora-
tions and securities regulations. It begins with a
very basic discussion of public corporations and
the act of going public, which is followed by a
discussion of securities markets and the Securi-
ties and Exchange Commission (SEC). This
chapter then examines the Securities Act of
1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
CHAPTER GOAL
The goal of this chapter is for students to
become familiar with the following terms
and topics concerning public corporations
and securities regulations:
Public corporation, publicly held corpora-
tion, public offering, initial public offering,
and securities
Securities markets in the United States and
the SEC
Important provisions of the major laws
regulating securities in the United States:
the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002
State securities regulations, or blue sky
laws
The role of corporate paralegals who spe-
cialize in securities law
Resources available to corporate parale-
gals who may be assisting in the securities
area
SUGGESTED APPROACH
Students may find it interesting to examine
securities cases that are in the news in con-
junction with their discussion of the material
in this chapter. Students should also become
somewhat familiar with the blue sky laws of
their home state and with other research and
reference aids dealing with securities. Stu-
dents may find it interesting to learn more
about corporations they are familiar with by
looking at the disclosure documents filed on
the SEC’s website.
LECTURE NOTES
The Public Corporations
1. A public corporation is a corporation that
has shares listed on a national securities
exchange or regularly traded in a market
maintained by one or more members of a
national securities association. The term
public corporation may be used synony-
mously with publicly held corporation
and publicly traded corporation. Public
corporations have a public market for
their shares, regardless of their size.
2. Securities that are offered and traded
publicly are subject to federal securities
regulations.
3. Any securities offered, sold, or delivered
through any means of interstate com-
merce are considered to be part of a pub-
lic offering and must first be registered in
accordance with the Securities Act of
1933 and any applicable state securities
law.
4. When the shareholders and directors of a
corporation decide to offer the corpora-
tion’s stock to the public, it is referred to
as going public.
5. The corporation’s first public offering of
its stock is referred to as an initial public
offering (IPO).
6. Corporate shareholders and directors typi-
cally decide to offer their stock for public
sale to take advantage of the capital gener-
ated from the sale of the stock.
CHAPTER 11 Public Corporations and Securities Regulations 77
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
7. Disadvantages to going public include
the loss of corporate control by the cur-
rent shareholders and the cost.
8. Initial public offerings tend to be more
popular when stock market values and
investor optimism are high. In times
when market values and market confi-
dence are lower, the number of initial
public offerings tends to decline.
9. After the decision is made to take a cor-
poration public, the issuers of the stock
typically enter into an underwriting
agreement. The underwriters agree to sell
the shares of the corporation to dealers
for resale.
Securities and Securities Markets
10. Shares of stock, bonds, notes, and any
documents showing a share in a company
or a debt owed by a company or a gov-
ernment are usually included in the defi-
nition of the term securities.
11. The U.S. Supreme Court has defined a
security as any investment in a common
enterprise from which the investor is “led
to expect profits solely from the efforts of
a promoter or a third party.”
12. Securities of a public corporation may be
traded at a stock exchange or over the
counter.
13. Traditionally, stock exchanges were ac-
tual physical locations where securities
were traded by exchange members on the
exchange floor. In recent years, with the
advent of online trading, not all exchang-
es use exchange floors for the trading of
stocks and commodities.
14. The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
trades the largest volume of stock, and is
generally considered to be the most pres-
tigious exchange. It sets listing standards
that include a minimum shareholder dis-
tribution, minimum number of shares
traded, and minimum assets and revenue.
Trading on the New York Stock Ex-
change has always taken place on a trad-
ing floor where qualified floor brokers
and specialists buy and sell stock in an
auction style. In recent years, the NYSE
has moved to a hybrid market that auto-
mates much of what the brokers and
dealers do, although there is still trading
on the floor of the New York Stock Ex-
change.
15. When the National Association of Securi-
ties Dealers Automated Quotation
(NASDAQ) system opened in 1971, it
was not considered a stock exchange, but
rather an automated quotation system for
over-the-counter stocks. With no trading
floor, the NASDAQ served as a new
model for the stock exchanges, and in
2006, the NASDAQ moved from a na-
tional securities association to a national
securities exchange, falling under the
rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
16. Stock exchanges and the NASDAQ are
both self-regulated. They are also both
subject to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Securities and Exchange Commission
17. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
created the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), which is headed by
five presidential appointees.
18. The primary mission of the SEC is to
protect investors and maintain the integri-
ty of the securities markets.
Federal Regulation of Securities Offerings
under the Securities Act of 1933
19. The Securities Act of 1933 was the first
significant federal legislation to protect
the investor through the imposition of
disclosure and antifraud measures for
corporations issuing securities through
means of interstate commerce.
78 PART I Guide for Instructors and Answers to Chapter Review Questions
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
20. The SEC imposes disclosure require-
ments upon corporations that offer secu-
rities to the public through enforcement
of the Securities Act of 1933, which re-
lates to the initial registration and issu-
ance of securities through means of inter-
state commerce.
21. Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933
requires that, prior to the issuance of any
securities through interstate commerce,
the issuer must file a registration state-
ment with the SEC. The purpose of the
registration statement is to disclose the
information necessary to allow investors
to make informed decisions.
22. The prospectus, which constitutes Part I
of the registration statement, contains
important disclosures concerning the
corporation. The prospectus must be fur-
nished to the purchaser of securities after
the securities have been registered with
the SEC.
23. Section 5(b) of the Securities Act prohib-
its the sale of registered securities with-
out a prospectus that meets the require-
ments of the Securities Act.
24. Regulation C allows the use of a sum-
mary prospectus to sell securities of a
registered corporation, as long as the
summary prospectus includes a required
statement indicating that the more com-
plete prospectus is available.
25. A red herring prospectus may be used
prior to the effective date of a registration
statement. The red herring prospectus
must specifically state that sales may not
be made until the effective date of the
registration statement.
26. Tombstone ads are also used during the
waiting period to announce a securities
offering and to disseminate certain in-
formation regarding the offering. These
tombstone ads, which are frequently
found in the business section of major
newspapers, must follow certain guide-
lines and contain certain legends pre-
scribed by the rules.
27. The Registration Statement (Form S-1) is
filed electronically with the SEC via its
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and
Retrieval (EDGAR) system, along with
the required supporting documents and
filing fee.
28. Registration statements, annual reports,
and other disclosure documents of all
public corporations may be accessed
through the EDGAR database at
http://www. sec.gov.
Exemptions from the Registration Re-
quirements of the Securities Act of 1933
29. An issue of securities may be exempt
from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933 because of the
type or class of securities or the specific
transaction involving the securities.
30. Securities that are scrutinized by other
governmental agencies, such as the bank-
ing or insurance commissions, or securi-
ties that are sold to a specific group of in-
formed investors, often fall under the
category of exempted securities.
31. Exemption from the registration require-
ments of the Securities Act does not pro-
vide exemption from the other provisions
of the Securities Act or related securities
regulations, especially the antifraud pro-
visions.
Antifraud Provisions of the Securities Act
of 1933
32. The Securities Act includes several anti-
fraud provisions to protect investors who
rely on the disclosures mandated by the
Securities Act.
33. Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
provides that everyone who signs or con-
tributes material information to the regis-
tration statement has a duty to provide
complete and accurate information. All
the individuals who sign or contribute to
CHAPTER 11 Public Corporations and Securities Regulations 79
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
the registration statement, including the
underwriter and the directors, are respon-
sible for any misstatements and omis-
sions throughout the registration state-
ment, except experts. Experts are respon-
sible for misstatements and omissions on-
ly in those parts of the registration state-
ment that they are responsible for having
prepared or certified.
34. Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933
concerns the prospectus, and is designed
to protect investors from purchasing se-
curities based on false or misleading pro-
spectuses or sales pitches.
35. Section 17 prohibits fraudulent conduct
with regard to the sale of, or offer to sell,
securities.
Federal Regulations Imposed on Public
Corporations under the Securities Ex-
change Act of 1934
36. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
protects securities investors and the gen-
eral public by regulating securities ex-
changes and markets, by requiring peri-
odic reporting of information regarding
the issuance of securities, and by prohib-
iting fraud and manipulation in the trad-
ing of securities.
37. In addition to the registration require-
ments under the Securities Act, the Ex-
change Act requires the issuer of all non-
exempt securities traded on a national se-
curities exchange to register those securi-
ties with that exchange. All exchanges
are required to be registered with the
SEC.
38. Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, all nonexempt public corpora-
tions must file annual (Form 10-K) and
quarterly (Form 10-Q) reports with the
SEC.
39. Form 8-K must be completed and filed
by the issuer of registered securities
when certain pertinent information in the
registration statement changes.
40. The periodic reports required by the Se-
curities Exchange Act of 1934 are filed
electronically via EDGAR and are avail-
able to the public.
41. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
provides certain requirements for the use
of proxies and proxy statements.
42. Regulations 14A and 14C require that if
the proxy solicitation is made on behalf
of the board of directors and relates to the
election of directors, the proxy statement
must be accompanied or preceded by an
annual report to shareholders that meets
the requirements of Rule 14a-3.
43. The annual report to shareholders, which
is an important shareholders’ relations
tool, includes the corporation’s financial
statements, a description of the corpora-
tion’s business during the most recent
year, information concerning each direc-
tor and officer, and other information re-
quired by Rule 14a-3. The annual report
is designed to promote a positive image
of the corporation.
Antifraud Provisions of the Securities Ex-
change Act of 1934
44. Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 prohibits any misleading or
fraudulent means in connection with the
purchase or sale of any security.
45. Insider trading is prosecuted under §
10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Section 10(b) makes it unlawful for an
insider to purchase or sell stock based on
information that has not been released to
the public, thereby taking unfair ad-
vantage of the uninformed investor.
46. When corporate insiders become aware
of nonpublic corporate information, they
must disclose that information to the pub-
lic, or they must abstain from acting on
that information. Since disclosure of pri-
vate corporate information is usually not
an option to the corporate insider, absten-
80 PART I Guide for Instructors and Answers to Chapter Review Questions
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
tion from trading is usually what is re-
quired.
47. Profits made by an insider on the purchase
and sale of securities within a six-month pe-
riod are referred to as short-swing profits
and are prohibited under § 16 of the Securi-
ties Exchange Act of 1934.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
48. In 2002, Congress passed the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act, also known as the Public Ac-
counting Reform and Investor Protection
Act of 2002, in response to major corpo-
rate and accounting scandals in the Unit-
ed States in 2000 and 2001.
49. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 subjects
corporations to tighter controls with re-
gard to their accounting and auditing
procedures, corporate governance, and
reporting requirements.
50. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act established the
Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (PCAOB), a new entity to oversee
auditors and the audit of public compa-
nies.
51. Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 requires the chief executive officer
(CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO)
of public corporations to certify the 10-K
and 10-Q and similar reports, indicating
the following:
They have reviewed the report.
The report is truthful.
The financial statements included in
the report fairly represent the finan-
cial condition and results of operation
of the corporation.
They have established and main-
tained controls as prescribed by stat-
ute.
They have disclosed to their auditors
and the audit committee any signifi-
cant problems with internal controls
and any fraud involving management
or key employees.
52. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 also
requires public corporations to appoint a
certain number of independent directors
to the board and to the audit committee in
particular.
53. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act significantly
increases the maximum criminal penal-
ties that may be imposed on corporate of-
ficers for securities law violations.
State Securities Regulation—Blue Sky
Laws
54. Blue sky laws are state laws concerning
the sale of securities. Blue sky laws co-
ordinate with the federal securities acts
and are considered to be valid so long as
they do not conflict with pertinent federal
acts.
55. Most states have adopted, at least to a
significant extent, the original Uniform
Securities Act (1956), the Uniform Secu-
rities Act (1985), or the Uniform Securi-
ties Act (2002). However, blue sky laws
vary from state to state, and the laws of
any state where a contract for the sale of
securities is entered into or executed
must be consulted.
State Regulation of Stock Offerings
56. In addition to filing at the federal level,
blue sky laws may require the issuers of
securities to file at the state level.
57. State securities registration is typically
coordinated with the filing of the regis-
tration statements with the SEC, and less
information may be required at the state
level because the information needed will
be of public record with the SEC.
State Securities Regulation—Antifraud
Provisions
58. State statutes also prohibit fraudulent ac-
tivities connected with the offer, sale, and
purchase of securities, similar to the anti-
fraud provisions found in the Securities
Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
CHAPTER 11 Public Corporations and Securities Regulations 81
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
The Paralegal’s Role
59. Corporate paralegals who specialize in
securities law are often very involved in
assisting with initial public offerings,
with blue sky research and filing, and
with preparing and filing the 10-K and
other periodic reports required by the
SEC.
CASE BRIEFS
Carpenter v. United States, 108 S.Ct. 316
(U.S. 1987)
Purpose: This is an example of an insider
trading case prosecuted under § 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although
this case includes several related issues, the
case has been edited to give focus to the §
10(b) charges as discussed in the text.
Cause of Action: Violation of § 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, violation of
federal mail and wire fraud statutes, and con-
spiracy
Facts: In the summer of 1982, Defendant R.
Foster Winans (“Winans”) became one of the
two writers of a Wall Street Journal daily col-
umn, “Heard on the Street.” That column dis-
cussed selected stocks or groups of stocks,
giving positive and negative information about
those stocks and taking “a point of view with
respect to investment in the stocks that it re-
views.” Because of the perceived quality and
integrity of the column, the column had an
impact on the market for the featured stock.
Contrary to the official policy and
practice at the Journal, Winans entered into a
scheme in October 1983 with Peter Brant
(“Brant”) and Kenneth P. Felis (“Felis”) to
give them advance information as to the tim-
ing and contents of the column. Both Brant
and Felis were connected with the Kidder
Peabody brokerage firm in New York City.
Brant and Felis were then able to buy or sell
based on the probable impact of the column
on the market. Profits were to be shared. Over
a four-month period, Brant and Felis made
several prepublication trades on the basis of
information given them by Winans for a net
profit of about $690,000.
In November 1983, correlation be-
tween the “Heard” articles and trading in the
Clark and Felis accounts were noted at Kidder
Peabody and inquiries began. Some time later,
the SEC began an investigation. On March 29,
1984, Winans and his roommate, David Car-
penter (who was also charged in the scheme),
went to the SEC and revealed the entire
scheme. An indictment and bench trial fol-
lowed. Winans, Carpenter, and Felis were
charged with participating in a scheme to trade
in securities based on information misappro-
priated from the Wall Street Journal in viola-
tion of § 10(b) and 32 of the Securities Ex-
change Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promul-
gated thereunder. They were also charged with
violation of various mail and wire fraud stat-
utes. All three defendants were also charged
with conspiracy to violate those statutes and to
obstruct justice by their agreement to cover up
and obstruct any investigation of the scheme.
With respect to the § 10(b) charges,
the courts below held that the deliberate
breach of Winans’s duty of confidentiality and
concealment of the scheme was a fraud and
deceit on the Journal. The district court found
Winans and Felis guilty of securities fraud by
misappropriating material, nonpublic infor-
mation from the Wall Street Journal in con-
nection with the purchase and sale of securi-
ties, and of mail and wire fraud. Winans and
Felis were also convicted of conspiracy to
commit such securities and mail and wire
frauds and to obstruct justice. Carpenter was
convicted of aiding and abetting in the com-
mission of securities fraud and mail and wire
fraud. With a minor exception, the court of
appeals upheld the convictions.
Carpenter, Felis, and Winans appealed
to the U.S. Supreme Court. The appellants ar-
gued that they could not be held criminally
liable for violating, or conspiring to violate, or
aiding and abetting in violating, § 10(b) of the
82 PART I Guide for Instructors and Answers to Chapter Review Questions
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule
10b-5, because they were not corporate insid-
ers or “quasi-insiders” and did not misappro-
priate material nonpublic information from
such insiders or “quasi-insiders.”
Issue: Can the petitioners be held criminally
liable for violating, or conspiring to violate, or
aiding and abetting in violating, § 10(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, even though
they were not corporate insiders and did not
misappropriate material nonpublic information
from such insiders?
Holding: Yes, judgment of the lower court is
upheld.
Reasoning: Although the victim of the fraud,
the Journal, was not a buyer or seller of the
stocks traded in or otherwise a market partici-
pant, the fraud was nevertheless considered to
be “in connection with” a purchase or sale of
securities within the meaning of the statute
and the rule. The courts reasoned that the
scheme’s sole purpose was to buy and sell se-
curities at a profit based on advance infor-
mation of the column’s contents. The court
found it irrelevant that petitioners might not
have interfered with the Journal’s use of its
confidential information, publicized the in-
formation, deprived the Journal of the first
public use of the information, or caused the
Journal monetary loss, because the Journal
was deprived of its important right to exclu-
sive use of the information prior to disclosing
it to the public. The confidential information
was generated from the business, and the
business had a right to decide how to use it
prior to disclosing it to the public.
Merrill Lynch v. Livingston, 566 F.2d 1119
(9th Cir. 1978)
Purpose: This case includes a good discussion
of the applicability to employees of the short-
swing provisions of § 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act.
Cause of Action: Violation of § 16(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Facts: In 1972, Merrill Lynch awarded 48 of
its account executives with the title of “Vice
President,” including defendant-appellant Wil-
liam G. Livingston (“Livingston”). Livingston
had worked for Merrill Lynch as a securities
salesman with the title of “Account Execu-
tive” for several years. Livingston had exactly
the same duties after he was awarded the title
as he did before the recognition. He was not
included in meetings of the board of directors
or the executive committee, and he acquired
no executive or policy-making duties.
Livingston and other salespersons for
Merrill Lynch received some information that
was not generally available to the investing
public, such as the growth production rankings
on the various Merrill Lynch retail offices.
Livingston’s supervisor, a branch office man-
ager, testified that the information Livingston
received about the company was not useful for
purposes of trading stock in the company.
In November and December 1972,
Livingston sold a total of 1,000 shares of Mer-
rill Lynch stock. He repurchased 1,000 shares
of Merrill Lynch stock in March 1973, realiz-
ing a profit of $14,836.37.
Merrill Lynch brought suit against Liv-
ingston demanding repayment of the profit he
made on a short-swing transaction in the secu-
rities of his employer in alleged violation of §
16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. § 78p [1971]). The district court
held that Livingston was an officer with ac-
cess to inside information within the meaning
of § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and ordered Livingston to repay the
$14,836. The predicate for the district court’s
decision was that § 16(b) imposes strict liabil-
ity on any person who holds the title of “of-
ficer” and who has access to information
about his company that is not generally avail-
able to the members of the investing public.
Livingston appealed the decision to the U.S.
Court of Appeals.
page-pf8
CHAPTER 11 Public Corporations and Securities Regulations 83
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
Issue: Is an employee considered an officer
under the meaning of § 16(b) of the Securities
Act regarding short-swing transactions merely
because he holds the title of an officer?
probable than not that the individual has ac-
cess to insider information. The Court of Ap-
peals found that insider information under §
16(b) does not mean all information about the
company that is not public knowledge. Instead
it encompasses that kind of confidential in-
formation about the company’s affairs that
would help the particular employee to make
Livingston did not receive insider in-
formation within the meaning of § 16(b). The
generally available to all Merrill Lynch sales-
people. It was not information reserved for
company management, nor did it give him any
kind of advantage in his security transactions
over any other salesperson for Merrill Lynch.
1. What are some of the advantages and
disadvantages of taking a privately held
corporation public?
Advantages of taking a privately held
creased immediate and future availa-
bility of capital through the sale of
stock to the public. Publicly held cor-
porations may also have added incen-
other incentives. In addition, the pub-
licly held corporation has the ad-
vantage of gaining national exposure
for itself and its products and/or
services.
2. What are the two general requirements of
§ 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 with re-
gard to securities that are offered or sold
through any means of interstate com-
merce?
1. Prior to the issuance of any securi-
ties sold to the public, the issuer
2. A prospectus meeting the require-
ments of Section 5 of the Securities
3. What is the due diligence defense?
It is a defense available to individuals
who use due diligence to ascertain the
To whom is the due diligence defense
available?
It is available to individuals, other than
4. What is the purpose of Form 8-K?
It is to notify the SEC and the public
when certain information contained in
page-pf9
84 PART I Guide for Instructors and Answers to Chapter Review Questions
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
6. What is the definition and the origin of
the term “blue sky laws”?
The term refers to state statutes regu-
lating securities. It was derived from
an early U.S. Supreme Court case in
more basis than so many feet of blue
sky.”
7. As a 20 percent shareholder in a publicly
owned corporation, Jane has decided to
sell her shares. What special require-
cent of the stock in the publicly owned
corporation, she is subject to § 16 of
the Exchange Act, which provides that
any profits realized from the purchase
and sale (or sale and purchase) of the
equity securities of a corporation by
insiders and/or principal shareholders
8. What is the purpose of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act, and what prompted its pas-
sage?
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed to
subject public corporations to tighter
controls concerning their accounting
and auditing procedures, corporate
9. What are the purposes of the proxy and
the proxy statement?
The proxy is used by shareholders to
register their votes at shareholder
meetings without actually attending.
10. When is the Form 10-K filed?
The 10-K must be filed electronically
with the SEC via EDGAR within 90
days after the end of the corporation’s
SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO
PRACTICAL PROBLEMS
The Practical Problems in this chapter ask stu-
dents to locate the state securities act within
the statutes of their home state to answer some
ter asks students to consider the importance of
using due diligence when preparing a registra-
tion statement for securities.
Exercise:
When preparing a registration state-
ment, what steps can attorneys and
paralegals follow to ensure that due
CHAPTER 11 Public Corporations and Securities Regulations 85
©2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
diligence is used to provide factual
information about the corporation?
Why is it so important to use due
diligence when preparing a registra-
tion statement for securities?
SUGGESTIONS AND SAMPLE
DOCUMENTS FOR THE
WORKPLACE SCENARIO
The Workplace Scenario at the end of this
chapter asks students to research a publicly
held corporation that has proposed a merger
with their fictitious corporation. To answer the
questions in this scenario, students will need
to familiarize themselves with the SEC’s web-
site at http://www. sec.gov and they will need
to locate and read electronically stored docu-
ments that have been filed with the SEC.

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.